ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2011
Redesign of a computerized clinical reminder for colorectal cancer screening: a human-computer interaction evaluation.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04331535 (Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Polygenic Risk Scoring for Common Diseases in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Pragmatic Randomized Trial of Polygenic Risk Scoring for Common Diseases in Primary Care
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why aren't they used? Systematic review of barriers to implementation of clinical decision support systems for early cancer detection in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Pooled it
- The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: systematic review and recommendations.Implementation science : IS · 2025Pooled it
- The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Towards Usable E-Health. A Systematic Review of Usability Questionnaires.Applied clinical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- An appraisal of published usability evaluations of electronic health records via systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- Workflow integration analysis of a human factors-based clinical decision support in the emergency department.Applied ergonomics · 2021Article
- A Primer on Usability Assessment Approaches for Health-Related Applications of Virtual Reality.JMIR serious games · 2020Article
- The Integrating Pharmacogenetics in Clinical Care (I-PICC) Study: Protocol for a point-of-care randomized controlled trial of statin pharmacogenetics in primary care.Contemporary clinical trials · 2018Article
- Designing Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Support: A Cognitive Engineering Enterprise.Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making · 2016Article
- Defining the methodological challenges and opportunities for an effective science of sociotechnical systems and safety.Ergonomics · 2015Review
- An experience of qualified preventive screening: shiraz smart screening software.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2015Article
- Use of health information technology to reduce diagnostic errors.BMJ quality & safety · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBased on barriers to the use of computerized clinical decision support (CDS) learned in an earlier field study, we prototyped design enhancements to the Veterans Health Administration's (VHA's) colorectal cancer (CRC) screening clinical reminder to compare against the VHA's current CRC reminder.
methodsIn a controlled simulation experiment, 12 primary care providers (PCPs) used prototypes of the current and redesigned CRC screening reminder in a within-subject comparison. Quantitative measurements were based on a usability survey, workload assessment instrument, and workflow integration survey. We also collected qualitative data on both designs.
resultsDesign enhancements to the VHA's existing CRC screening clinical reminder positively impacted aspects of usability and workflow integration but not workload. The qualitative analysis revealed broad support across participants for the design enhancements with specific suggestions for improving the reminder further.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the value of a human-computer interaction evaluation in informing the redesign of information tools to foster uptake, integration into workflow, and use in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.