ArticleBMC research notes2011
Clustering of classical swine fever virus isolates by codon pair bias.
Article in BMC research notes, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy Evaluation of an E2 Subunit Vaccine Against Highly Virulent Classical Swine Fever Virus Strain.Vaccines · 2025Article
- Dengue virus preferentially uses human and mosquito non-optimal codons.Molecular systems biology · 2024Article
- Phylodynamics of classical swine fever virus in Brazil.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2022Article
- Compositional biases in RNA viruses: Causes, consequences and applications.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2022Review
- Evolution and host adaptability of plant RNA viruses: Research insights on compositional biases.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Complete genome sequences of classical swine fever virus: Phylogenetic and evolutionary analyses.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Phylogenetic analysis of classical swine fever virus isolates from China.Archives of virology · 2021Article
- ADAM17 is an essential attachment factor for classical swine fever virus.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Analysis of Virus Population Profiles within Pigs Infected with Virulent Classical Swine Fever Viruses: Evidence for Bottlenecks in Transmission but Absence of Tissue-Specific Virus Variants.Journal of virology · 2020Article
- Complete genomic characteristics and pathogenic analysis of the newly emerged classical swine fever virus in China.BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
- Classical Swine Fever-An Updated Review.Viruses · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe genetic code consists of non-random usage of synonymous codons for the same amino acids, termed codon bias or codon usage. Codon juxtaposition is also non-random, referred to as codon context bias or codon pair bias. The codon and codon pair bias vary among different organisms, as well as with viruses. Reasons for these differences are not completely understood. For classical swine fever virus (CSFV), it was suggested that the synonymous codon usage does not significantly influence virulence, but the relationship between variations in codon pair usage and CSFV virulence is unknown. Virulence can be related to the fitness of a virus: Differences in codon pair usage influence genome translation efficiency, which may in turn relate to the fitness of a virus. Accordingly, the potential of the codon pair bias for clustering CSFV isolates into classes of different virulence was investigated.
resultsThe complete genomic sequences encoding the viral polyprotein of 52 different CSFV isolates were analyzed. This included 49 sequences from the GenBank database (NCBI) and three newly sequenced genomes. The codon usage did not differ among isolates of different virulence or genotype. In contrast, a clustering of isolates based on their codon pair bias was observed, clearly discriminating highly virulent isolates and vaccine strains on one side from moderately virulent strains on the other side. However, phylogenetic trees based on the codon pair bias and on the primary nucleotide sequence resulted in a very similar genotype distribution.
conclusionClustering of CSFV genomes based on their codon pair bias correlate with the genotype rather than with the virulence of the isolates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.