Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22124510›Full record

ArticleJournal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie2011

Myogenic differentiation factor 1 and myogenin expression not elevated in regenerated masticatory muscles of dystrophic (mdx) mice.

Alexander Spassov, Tomasz Gredes, Christian Lehmann, Tomasz Gedrange, Silke Lucke, Dragan Pavlovic, Christiane Kunert-Keil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexander SpassovDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. alexspas@uni-greifswald.de
Tomasz Gredes
Christian Lehmann
Tomasz Gedrange
Silke Lucke
Dragan Pavlovic
Christiane Kunert-Keil
Universität Greifswald · DEDalhousie University · CAUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOrofacial muscles in mdx mice, a model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), undergo muscle necrosis followed by muscle regeneration. The activity of myogenic regulatory factors (MRF) in muscles that regenerate may reveal specific changes. Little is known about the role of MRF, particularly their expression after muscle necrosis in the orofacial muscles of mdx mice and in DMD. Patients suffering from DMD present characteristic malocclusions in association with orofacial dysfunctions. Investigating the role of MRFs in mdx masticatory muscles may help to develop preventive and therapeutic strategies for DMD. MATERIAL AND

methodsUsing Western Blot analysis, we examined the protein expression of MRFs (myogenin and MyoD1) in masticatory muscles such as masseter, temporal, and tongue muscle and one hindlimb muscle, the soleus of control and mdx mice (n = 6-7). The mean optical density (MOD) of proteins was measured for quantification.

resultsMyogenin and MyoD1 were detected in mdx and control mice. The amount of myogenin in masseter (MOD, mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), control vs. mdx: 3.08 ± 0.67 vs. 1.83 ± 0.33), tongue (MOD control vs. mdx: 1.53 ± 0.22 vs. 1.41 ± 0.14), temporal (MOD control vs. mdx: 1.23 ± 0.16 vs. 1.43 ± 0.35), and soleus muscles (MOD, control vs. mdx: 1.95 ± 0.26 vs. 2.31 ± 0.42) did not differ between the mouse strains. MyoD1 amounts in mdx, similar to that of myogenin, remained unchanged when compared to control mice (MOD control vs. mdx: masseter 0.75 ± 0.09 vs. 0.86 ± 0.13; tongue 1.55 ± 0.25 vs. 1.41 ± 0.28; temporal 0.71 ± 0.10 vs. 0.73 ± 0.11; soleus 1.09 ± 0.26 vs. 1.03 ± 0.24).

conclusionThe results indicate that protein expression of MyoD1 and myogenin in mdx mice does not differ from controls, suggesting a secondary role of MyoD1 and myogenin in the regeneration stage of mdx orofacial muscles.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMaleMasticatory MusclesMiceMice, Inbred mdxMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneMyoD ProteinMyogeninRegenerationUp-RegulationMyoD1 myogenic differentiation proteinMyoD ProteinMyogeninMyog protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID22124510
OpenAlexW123405567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.