Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22124480›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2011

Emerging biomedical applications of synthetic biology.

Wilfried Weber, Martin Fussenegger

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 358 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Why cellular computations challenge our design principles.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Engineering Cyborg Bacteria Through Intracellular Hydrogelation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wilfried WeberFaculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Schänzlestrasse 1, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany.
Martin Fussenegger
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic biology aims to create functional devices, systems and organisms with novel and useful functions on the basis of catalogued and standardized biological building blocks. Although they were initially constructed to elucidate the dynamics of simple processes, designed devices now contribute to the understanding of disease mechanisms, provide novel diagnostic tools, enable economic production of therapeutics and allow the design of novel strategies for the treatment of cancer, immune diseases and metabolic disorders, such as diabetes and gout, as well as a range of infectious diseases. In this Review, we cover the impact and potential of synthetic biology for biomedical applications.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSynthetic BiologyAnimalsAptamers, NucleotideBiomimetic MaterialsBiomimeticsBiotechnologyCell LineCell Line, TumorDrug DesignEpigenomicsGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, SyntheticGenetic EngineeringHumansLight Signal TransductionAptamers, NucleotideVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID22124480
PMCPMC7097403
OpenAlexW2042352676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.