Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22124137›Full record

ReviewJournal of leukocyte biology2012

Cell-surface receptors on macrophages and dendritic cells for attachment and entry of influenza virus.

Sarah L Londrigan, Michelle D Tate, Andrew G Brooks, Patrick C Reading

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. In Vivo Infection Model of Severe Influenza A Virus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah L LondriganThe Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle D Tate
Andrew G Brooks
Patrick C Reading
University of Melbourne · AUVictorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Airway MΦ and DCs are important components of innate host defense and can play a critical role in limiting the severity of influenza virus infection. Although it has been well established that cell-surface SA acts as a primary attachment receptor for IAV, the particular receptor(s) or coreceptor(s) that mediate IAV entry into any cell, including MΦ and DC, have not been clearly defined. Identifying which receptors are involved in attachment and entry of IAV into immune cells may have important implications in regard to understanding IAV tropism and pathogenesis. Recent evidence suggests that specialized receptors on MΦ and DCs, namely CLRs, can act as capture and/or entry receptors for many viral pathogens, including IAV. Herein, we review the early stages of infection of MΦ and DC by IAV. Specifically, we examine the potential role of CLRs expressed on MΦ and DC to act as attachment and/or entry receptors for IAV.

Indexed as

Virus InternalizationCalcitonin Receptor-Like ProteinDendritic CellsHumansInfluenza, HumanLectins, C-TypeMacrophagesOrthomyxoviridaeReceptors, Cell SurfaceCalcitonin Receptor-Like ProteinLectins, C-TypeReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID22124137
PMCPMC7166464
OpenAlexW2164597163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.