ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011
Systematic control of protein interaction using a modular ER/K α-helix linker.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Determinants of G Protein Subtype-Specific Coupling to the Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Structure-informed theoretical modeling defines principles governing avidity in bivalent protein interactions.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026Article
- Selective positive allosteric modulation of βNature communications · 2026Article
- Light-Based Molecular Tools to Precisely Monitor and Operate β-Adrenoceptors.Medicinal research reviews · 2026Review
- Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Anomalous photophysical behaviors attributed to excitonic coupling in fluorescent proteins.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
- Conformational Heterogeneity Underlying Divergent Signaling in Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Review
- An Improved Ratiometric FRET Biosensor with Higher Affinity for Extracellular ATP.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Annexin A6 membrane repair protein protects against amyloid-induced dystrophic neurites and tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease model mice.Acta neuropathologica · 2025Article
- Article
- Novel FRET-based Immunological Synapse Biosensor for the Prediction of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Function.Small methods · 2025Article
- Myosin VI drives arrestin-independent internalization and signaling of GPCRs.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Opto-chemogenetic inhibition of L-type CaCell reports methods · 2024Article
- Get Ready to Sharpen Your Tools: A Short Guide to Heterotrimeric G Protein Activity Biosensors.Molecular pharmacology · 2024Review
- Effects of Charge Sequence Pattern and Lysine-to-Arginine Substitution on the Structural Stability of Bioinspired Polyampholytes.Biomacromolecules · 2024Article
- cAMP signaling: a remarkably regional affair.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2024Review
- Modulating signalling lifetime to optimise a prototypical animal opsin for optogenetic applications.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Investigating G-protein coupled receptor signalling with light-emitting biosensors.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
- Nanosurfer assay dissects β-cardiac myosin and cardiac myosin-binding protein C interactions.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
- Förster resonance energy transfer biosensors for fluorescence and time-gated luminescence analysis of rac1 activity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellular functions of proteins are strongly influenced by their interactions with other proteins. The frequency of protein interactions is a function of the local concentration of two proteins and their affinity for one another. When two proteins are tethered together, the link between them influences their effective concentrations and therefore the frequency of their interaction. Currently no methods exist to systematically vary the effective concentration within this intramolecular interaction. Here we outline a modular, genetically encoded linker, namely, an ER/K [genetically encoded polypeptide motif based on alternating sequence of approximately four glutamic acid (E) followed by approximately four arginine (R) or lysine (K) residues] single α-helix that can be used to regulate the frequency of interaction between two proteins, or between a protein and a peptide, one at each end. We exploit the wide range of interaction affinities between calmodulin and its binding peptides, combined with FRET to determine the effect of the ER/K α-helix in regulating protein interactions. We find that increasing the length of the ER/K α-helix reduces the on rate of the intramolecular interaction without significantly affecting the off rate, regardless of the affinity of the bimolecular interaction. We outline a genetically encoded approach to determine the dissociation constant for both moderate (micromolar K(d)) and strong (nanomolar K(d)) protein interactions. Our studies demonstrate the use of the ER/K α-helix to systematically engineer FRET biosensors that detect changes in concentration or affinity of interacting proteins, and modulate enzyme autoinhibition. Our findings are consistent with the ER/K α-helix as a worm-like chain with rare, stochastic breaks in the helix backbone that may account for the behavior of myosin VI stepping along actin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.