Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22123984›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Systematic control of protein interaction using a modular ER/K α-helix linker.

Sivaraj Sivaramakrishnan, James A Spudich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Genome-Wide Identification of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Opto-chemogenetic inhibition of L-type CaCell reports methods · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. cAMP signaling: a remarkably regional affair.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sivaraj SivaramakrishnanDepartment of Biochemistry, Beckman Center, B405, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. sivaraj@umich.edu
James A Spudich

Funding

MYOSIN MOVEMENT IN VITRO: MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATIONR01GM033289 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SPUDICH, JAMES · 1985 to 2024
$13.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM33289NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM033289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular functions of proteins are strongly influenced by their interactions with other proteins. The frequency of protein interactions is a function of the local concentration of two proteins and their affinity for one another. When two proteins are tethered together, the link between them influences their effective concentrations and therefore the frequency of their interaction. Currently no methods exist to systematically vary the effective concentration within this intramolecular interaction. Here we outline a modular, genetically encoded linker, namely, an ER/K [genetically encoded polypeptide motif based on alternating sequence of approximately four glutamic acid (E) followed by approximately four arginine (R) or lysine (K) residues] single α-helix that can be used to regulate the frequency of interaction between two proteins, or between a protein and a peptide, one at each end. We exploit the wide range of interaction affinities between calmodulin and its binding peptides, combined with FRET to determine the effect of the ER/K α-helix in regulating protein interactions. We find that increasing the length of the ER/K α-helix reduces the on rate of the intramolecular interaction without significantly affecting the off rate, regardless of the affinity of the bimolecular interaction. We outline a genetically encoded approach to determine the dissociation constant for both moderate (micromolar K(d)) and strong (nanomolar K(d)) protein interactions. Our studies demonstrate the use of the ER/K α-helix to systematically engineer FRET biosensors that detect changes in concentration or affinity of interacting proteins, and modulate enzyme autoinhibition. Our findings are consistent with the ER/K α-helix as a worm-like chain with rare, stochastic breaks in the helix backbone that may account for the behavior of myosin VI stepping along actin.

Indexed as

Protein Interaction MappingProtein Structure, SecondaryAmino Acid MotifsArginineBiosensing TechniquesCloning, MolecularFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferHumansKineticsLysineModels, GeneticModels, MolecularMolecular ConformationProtein Structure, TertiarySignal TransductionArginineLysine

Identifiers

PMID22123984
PMCPMC3251109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.