Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22123968›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Meiotic double-strand breaks occur once per pair of (sister) chromatids and, via Mec1/ATR and Tel1/ATM, once per quartet of chromatids.

Liangran Zhang, Keun P Kim, Nancy E Kleckner, Aurora Storlazzi

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Controlling Meiotic Double-Strand Break Formation in Mice: A Web of Multivalent Protein-Protein Interactions.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Dimerization of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Dying to Defend: Neutrophil Death Pathways and their Implications in Immunity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Genetic control of meiosis surveillance mechanisms in mammals.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Liangran ZhangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Keun P Kim
Nancy E Kleckner
Aurora Storlazzi

Funding

MEIOTIC CHROMOSOME SYNAPSIS AND RECOMBINATION IN YEASTR01GM044794 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI KLECKNER, NANCY E · 1990 to 2018
$13.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM044794NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM044794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination initiates via programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). We investigate whether, at a given initiation site, DSBs occur independently among the four available chromatids. For a single DSB "hot spot", the proportions of nuclei exhibiting zero, one, or two (or more) observable events were defined by tetrad analysis and compared with those predicted by different DSB distribution scenarios. Wild-type patterns are incompatible with independent distribution of DSBs among the four chromatids. In most or all nuclei, DSBs occur one-per-pair of chromatids, presumptively sisters. In many nuclei, only one DSB occurs per four chromatids, confirming the existence of trans inhibition where a DSB on one chromosome interactively inhibits DSB formation on the partner chromosome. Several mutants exhibit only a one-per-pair constraint, a phenotype we propose to imply loss of trans inhibition. Signal transduction kinases Mec1 (ATR) and Tel1 (ATM) exhibit this phenotype and thus could be mediators of this effect. Spreading trans inhibition can explain even spacing of total recombinational interactions and implies that establishment of interhomolog interactions and DSB formation are homeostatic processes. The two types of constraints on DSB formation provide two different safeguards against recombination failure during meiosis.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedMeiosisChromatidsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsModels, GeneticMutationProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMEC1 protein, S cerevisiaeProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTEL1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID22123968
PMCPMC3250133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.