Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22123742›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2012

Construction of repeat-free fluorescence in situ hybridization probes.

Joost F Swennenhuis, Brad Foulk, Frank A W Coumans, Leon W M M Terstappen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. FISH Going Meso-Scale: A Microscopic Search for Chromatin Domains.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joost F SwennenhuisDepartment of Medical Cell BioPhysics, MIRA Research Institute, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Brad Foulk
Frank A W Coumans
Leon W M M Terstappen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FISH probes are generally made out of BAC clones with genomic DNA containing a variable amount of repetitive DNA that will need to be removed or blocked for FISH analysis. To generate repeat free (RF) Probes without loss in genomic coverage, a random library is made from BAC clones by whole-genome amplification (WGA). Libraries are denatured in the presence of excess C(0)t-1 DNA and allowed to re-anneal followed by digestion of all double-stranded elements by duplex-specific nuclease (DSN). Selective amplification of all elements not containing repetitive sequences is realized by a sequential amplification. The final RF products can be re-amplified and used as a stock for future probe production. The RF probes have a lower background, the signal intensity build up is faster and there is no need for blocking DNA. The signal to background ratio of the RF was higher as compared to repeat containing probes.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceCell Line, TumorChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialDNAFemaleFluorescent DyesGene LibraryHumansMetaphasePolymerase Chain ReactionRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidDNAFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID22123742
PMCPMC3273791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.