Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22123097›Full record

ReviewCritical care clinics2012

Economics of ICU organization and management.

Hannah Wunsch, Hayley Gershengorn, Damon C Scales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care clinics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Application of Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing for Protocol-Driven Adult Open Airway Reconstruction.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Costs of Australian intensive care: A systematic review.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Review
  4. Limitation of Non-Beneficial Interventions and their Impact on the Intensive Care Unit Costs.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. [Cost analysis as a tool for assessing the efficacy of intensive care units].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah WunschDepartment of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA. hw2125@columbia.edu
Hayley Gershengorn
Damon C Scales

Funding

Use of intensive care services for elderly patients undergoing high risk surgicalK08AG038477 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WUNSCH, HANNAH · 2010 to 2014
$628k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG038477NIA NIH HHS K08AG038477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intensive care unit (ICU) is a complex system and the economic implications of altering care patterns in the ICU can be difficult to unravel. Few studies have specifically examined the economics of implementing organizational and management changes or acknowledged the many competing economic interests of patient, hospital,payer, and society. With continuously increasing healthcare costs,there is a great need for more studies focused on the optimal organization of the ICU. These studies should not focus solely on reductions in ICU length of stay but should strive to measure the true costs of care within a given healthcare system.

Indexed as

Critical CareHealth Care RationingHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22123097
PMCPMC3665001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.