Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22123065›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Antibodies for biodefense.

Jeffrey W Froude, Bradley Stiles, Thibaut Pelat, Philippe Thullier

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Therapeutic Antibodies Against Shiga Toxins: Trends and Perspectives.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deliberate release: Plague - A review.Journal of biosafety and biosecurity · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Monoclonal antibodies as anti-infective products: a promising future?Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jeffrey W FroudeU.S. Army Medical Research and Material Command, Fort Detrick, MD, USA.
Bradley Stiles
Thibaut Pelat
Philippe Thullier
Agir Pour les Maladies Chroniques · FRUnited States Army Medical Research and Development Command · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Potential bioweapons are biological agents (bacteria, viruses, and toxins) at risk of intentional dissemination. Biodefense, defined as development of therapeutics and vaccines against these agents, has seen an increase, particularly in the US following the 2001 anthrax attack. This review focuses on recombinant antibodies and polyclonal antibodies for biodefense that have been accepted for clinical use. These antibodies aim to protect against primary potential bioweapons, or category A agents as defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, Francisella tularensis, botulinum neurotoxins, smallpox virus, and certain others causing viral hemorrhagic fevers) and certain category B agents. Potential for prophylactic use is presented, as well as frequent use of oligoclonal antibodies or synergistic effect with other molecules. Capacities and limitations of antibodies for use in biodefense are discussed, and are generally applicable to the field of infectious diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalBacterial InfectionsBiological Warfare AgentsBioterrorismCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.HumansMiceRabbitsRecombinant ProteinsUnited StatesVirus DiseasesAntibodiesAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological Warfare AgentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22123065
PMCPMC3242838
OpenAlexW2017051676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.