ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2011
Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
98 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent progress in genomic prediction for Hanwoo cattle and its implications for beef quality: review.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- Optimizing genomic predictions in maize using a diversity panel and a multiparental population.The plant genome · 2026Article
- Accounting for population structure in genomic prediction of strawberry sweetness at a global scale.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome-wide association analysis of resistance to bacterial cold-water disease in an important rainbow trout aquaculture breeding population.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Accuracy of Genomic Predictions Cross Populations with Different Linkage Disequilibrium Patterns.Genes · 2024Article
- Enhancing Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Body Conformation Traits in Korean Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Use of the linear regression method to evaluate population accuracy of predictions from non-linear models.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an FJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Genomic Prediction Accuracies for Growth and Carcass Traits in a Brangus Heifer Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Selective genotyping to implement genomic selection in beef cattle breeding.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Genomic heritability and correlation between carcass traits in Japanese Black cattle evaluated under different ceilings of relatedness among individuals.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Article
- Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Red Angus cattle.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Genotyping and phenotyping strategies for genetic improvement of meat quality and carcass composition in swine.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Predicting the accuracy of genomic predictions.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Validation of the Prediction Accuracy for 13 Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle Using a Preselected Low-Density SNP Panel.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Determining Risk Factors Associated with Depression and Anxiety in Young Lung Cancer Patients: A Novel Optimization Algorithm.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2021Article
- A New Deep Learning Calibration Method Enhances Genome-Based Prediction of Continuous Crop Traits.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGenomic selection is a recently developed technology that is beginning to revolutionize animal breeding. The objective of this study was to estimate marker effects to derive prediction equations for direct genomic values for 16 routinely recorded traits of American Angus beef cattle and quantify corresponding accuracies of prediction.
methodsDeregressed estimated breeding values were used as observations in a weighted analysis to derive direct genomic values for 3570 sires genotyped using the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip. These bulls were clustered into five groups using K-means clustering on pedigree estimates of additive genetic relationships between animals, with the aim of increasing within-group and decreasing between-group relationships. All five combinations of four groups were used for model training, with cross-validation performed in the group not used in training. Bivariate animal models were used for each trait to estimate the genetic correlation between deregressed estimated breeding values and direct genomic values.
resultsAccuracies of direct genomic values ranged from 0.22 to 0.69 for the studied traits, with an average of 0.44. Predictions were more accurate when animals within the validation group were more closely related to animals in the training set. When training and validation sets were formed by random allocation, the accuracies of direct genomic values ranged from 0.38 to 0.85, with an average of 0.65, reflecting the greater relationship between animals in training and validation. The accuracies of direct genomic values obtained from training on older animals and validating in younger animals were intermediate to the accuracies obtained from K-means clustering and random clustering for most traits. The genetic correlation between deregressed estimated breeding values and direct genomic values ranged from 0.15 to 0.80 for the traits studied.
conclusionsThese results suggest that genomic estimates of genetic merit can be produced in beef cattle at a young age but the recurrent inclusion of genotyped sires in retraining analyses will be necessary to routinely produce for the industry the direct genomic values with the highest accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.