Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22122233›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2012

A clinical study to assess CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 induction by AZD7325, a selective GABA(A) receptor modulator - an in vitro and in vivo comparison.

Diansong Zhou, Maria Sunzel, Maria D Ribadeneira, Mark A Smith, Dhaval Desai, Jianrong Lin, Scott W Grimm

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Potentiating αThe Journal of physiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Synthesis of C-14 labeled GABAJournal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diansong ZhouClinical Pharmacology Science DMPK Clinical Neuroscience, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, DE 19850, USA. diansong.zhou@astrazeneca.com
Maria Sunzel
Maria D Ribadeneira
Mark A Smith
Dhaval Desai
Jianrong Lin
Scott W Grimm
Clinical Science Institute · USAstraZeneca (United States) · USWilmington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

what is already known about this subject• AZD7325 is an orally administered, potent, selective gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA(A) ) α2,3 receptor modulator intended for the treatment of anxiety. • The induction effects of AZD7325 on CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 have not been systematically studied. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • The in vitro studies showed that AZD7325 was a moderate CYP1A2 inducer and potent CYP3A4 inducer. • The follow-up clinical studies in healthy volunteers demonstrated that the expected efficacious daily dose of AZD7325 only weakly induced the pharmacokinetics of the CYP3A4 sensitive substrate, midazolam, and had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of the CYP1A2 substrate, caffeine. There was no apparent change in AZD7325 exposure following co-administration of midazolam or caffeine compared with AZD7325 alone. • The study demonstrated that clinical exposure of the inducer plays a critical role in the determination of cytochrome P450 induction risk of a drug candidate. AIM(S): To investigate the potential of AZD7325 to induce CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 enzyme activities.

methodsInduction of CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 by AZD7325 was first evaluated using cultured human hepatocytes. The effect of multiple doses of 10 mg AZD7325 on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and caffeine was then examined in healthy subjects.

resultsThe highest CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 induction responses were observed in human hepatocytes treated with 1 or 10 µm of AZD7325, in the range of 17.9%-54.9% and 76.9%-85.7% of the positive control responses, respectively. The results triggered the further clinical evaluation of AZD7325 induction potential. AZD7325 reached a plasma C(max) of 0.2 µm after 10 mg daily dosing to steady-state. AZD7325 decreased midazolam geometric mean AUC by 19% (0.81-fold, 90% CI 0.77, 0.87), but had no effect on midazolam C(max) (90% CI 0.82, 0.97). The mean CL/F of midazolam increased from 62 l h(-1) (midazolam alone) to 76 l h(-1) when co-administered with AZD7325. The AUC and C(max) of caffeine were not changed after co-administration of AZD7325, with geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of 1.17 (1.12, 1.23) and 0.99 (0.95, 1.03), respectively.

conclusionsWhile AZD7325 appeared to be a potent CYP3A4 inducer and a moderate CYP1A2 inducer from in vitro studies, the expected efficacious dose of AZD7325 had no effect on CYP1A2 activity and only a weak inducing effect on CYP3A4 activity. This comparison of in vitro and in vivo results demonstrates the critical role that clinical exposure plays in evaluating the CYP induction risk of a drug candidate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Anxiety AgentsArea Under CurveBlotting, WesternCaffeineCells, CulturedCentral Nervous System StimulantsCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADrug InteractionsGABA ModulatorsHepatocytesHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHumansMale4-amino-8-(2-fluoro-6-methoxy-phenyl)-N-propylcinnoline-3-carboxamideAnti-Anxiety AgentsCaffeineCentral Nervous System StimulantsCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Cytochrome P-450 CYP3AGABA ModulatorsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingMidazolamReceptors, GABA-ARNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22122233
PMCPMC3394133
OpenAlexW1484997091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.