ReviewPharmacotherapy2011
Novel oral anticoagulants and their role in clinical practice.
Review in Pharmacotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03182218 (Prospective Observational Study of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Periprocedural Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Observational Study of the Direct Oral Anticoagulants Periprocedural Management
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of dabigatran for appropriateness of use and bleeding events in a community hospital setting.American health & drug benefits · 2014Article
- Clinical utility of apixaban in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism: current evidence.Drug design, development and therapy · 2014Review
- The pharmacology of novel oral anticoagulants.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2014Review
- New oral anticoagulants: discussion on monitoring and adherence should start now!Thrombosis journal · 2013Article
- Venous thromboembolism due to suspected interaction between rivaroxaban and nevirapine.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2013Article
- Review
- Warfarin pharmacogenetics: challenges and opportunities for clinical translation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexities of oral anticoagulation with warfarin have led to the search for more practical alternative agents. Novel direct factor IIa inhibitors and direct factor Xa inhibitors currently in development can be administered at a fixed dose and do not require routine coagulation monitoring and ongoing dosage adjustment to ensure their effectiveness and safety. A number of phase III trials of these agents for the prevention of venous thromboembolism associated with orthopedic surgery and acute medical illness, for the treatment of venous thromboembolism, and for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation have been completed, with almost universally positive results. If these novel agents are approved for use in the United States, the future of oral anticoagulant therapy will allow a more nuanced approach to drug selection than has been available in the past. Attention to drug interactions and renal function will be required, as methods to measure the presence of these agents are not precise, cannot quantify the degree of anticoagulant present, and are influenced by the changes in serum drug concentrations during the dosing interval. In the future, patient preferences and the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of individual drugs will be able to be matched to optimize therapy. These new agents represent a new paradigm for anticoagulation that promises to improve patient care in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.