Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22120766›Full record

Trial reportIntensive care medicine2012

Designing and conducting a randomized trial for pandemic critical illness: the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Djillali Annane, Marion Antona, Blandine Lehmann, Cecile Kedzia, Sylvie Chevret, CORTIFLU Investigators, CRICs, AZUREA, REVA/SRLF networks

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Intensive care medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01014364 (Phase III Study of Hydrocortisone in Patients With Severe H1N1 Related Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01014364 phase3terminatednot on this map

Phase III Study of Hydrocortisone in Patients With Severe H1N1 Related Pneumonia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VersaillesRan2010 to 2011Enrolled40ConditionsPneumonia, Viral, Influenza in HumansArmshydrocortisone, isotonic saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Influenza and Viral Pneumonia.Clinics in chest medicine · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Djillali AnnaneGeneral ICU, Raymond Poincaré Hospital, AP-HP, University of Versailles SQ, 104 boulevard Raymond Poincaré, 92380 Garches, France. djillali.annane@rpc.aphp.fr
Marion Antona
Blandine Lehmann
Cecile Kedzia
Sylvie Chevret
CORTIFLU Investigators
CRICs
AZUREA
REVA/SRLF networks
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRDélégation Paris 7 · FRInstitut Lavoisier de Versailles · FRSaint Louis University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the hurdles in implementing a randomized trial of corticosteroids for severe 2009 H1N1 influenza infections.

methodsThis was an investigator-led, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of corticosteroids in ICU patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation. The feasibility of and hurdles in designing and initiating a phase III trial in a short-lived pandemic crisis were analyzed. The regulatory agency and ethics committee approved the study's scientific, financial, and ethical aspects within 4 weeks. Hydrocortisone and placebo were prepared centrally and shipped to participating hospitals within 6 weeks. The inclusion period started on November 9, 2009.

resultsFrom August 1, 2009 to March 8, 2010, only 205/224 ICU patients with H1N1 infections required mechanical ventilation. The peak of the wave was missed by 2-3 weeks and only 26 patients were randomized. The two main reasons for non-inclusion were patients' admission before the beginning of the trial and ICU personnel overwhelmed by clinical duties. Parallel rather than sequential regulatory and ethics approval, and preparation and masking of study drugs by local pharmacists would have allowed the study to start 1 month earlier and before the peak of the "flu" wave. A dedicated research team in each participating center would have increased the ratio of screened to randomized patients.

conclusionThis report highlights the main hurdles in implementing a randomized trial for a pandemic critical illness and proposes solutions for future trials.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeResearch DesignAdrenal Cortex HormonesCritical IllnessDouble-Blind MethodEthics, ResearchFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAdrenal Cortex Hormones

Identifiers

PMID22120766
OpenAlexW2021386656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.