Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22119854›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2012

A randomised comparison of Cartomerge vs. NavX fusion in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the CAVERN Trial.

Malcolm C Finlay, Ross J Hunter, Victoria Baker, Laura Richmond, Farai Goromonzi, Glyn Thomas, Kim Rajappan, Edward Duncan, Muzahir Tayebjee, Mehul Dhinoja and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cardiac CT for electrophysiological interventions.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025
    Review
  2. Pre- and post-procedural cardiac imaging (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) in electrophysiology: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Applications of multimodality imaging for left atrial catheter ablation.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. 3D-XGuide: open-source X-ray navigation guidance system.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Stem cell therapy for chronic heart failure: an updated appraisal.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2013
    Review
  16. Ablation for atrial fibrillation: CT overlay or standard electroanatomical mapping?Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2012
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Malcolm C FinlayCardiology Research Department, Barts and the London NHS Trust and University College London, St Bartholomew's Hospital, First Floor Dominion House, 60 Bartholomew Close, West Smithfield, London, EC1A 7BE, UK.
Ross J Hunter
Victoria Baker
Laura Richmond
Farai Goromonzi
Glyn Thomas
Kim Rajappan
Edward Duncan
Muzahir Tayebjee
Mehul Dhinoja
Simon Sporton
Mark J Earley
Richard J Schilling
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntegration of a 3D reconstruction of the left atrium into cardiac mapping systems can aid catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The two most widely used systems are NavX Fusion and Cartomerge. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of these systems in a randomised trial.

methodsPatients undergoing their first ablation were randomised to mapping using either NavX fusion or CartoMerge. Pulmonary vein isolation by wide area circumferential ablation was performed for paroxysmal AF with additional linear and fractionated potential ablation for persistent AF. Seven-day Holter monitoring was used for confirmation of sinus rhythm maintenance at 6 months.

resultsNinety-seven patients were randomised and underwent a procedure. There was no difference in the primary endpoint of freedom from arrhythmia at 6 months (51% in the Cartomerge group vs. 48% in the NavX Fusion group, p = 0.76). 3D image registration was faster with Cartomerge (24 vs. 33 min, p = 0.0001), used less fluoroscopic screening (11 vs. 15 min, p = 0.039) with a lower fluoroscopic dose (840 vs. 1,415 mGyCm(2), p = 0.043). There was a strong trend to lower ablation times in the Cartomerge group, overall RF time (3,292 s vs. 4,041, p = 0.07). Distance from 3D lesion to 3D image shell was smaller in the Cartomerge group (2.7 ± 1.9 vs. 3.3 ± 3.7 mm, p < 0.001).

conclusionsCartomerge appears to be faster and uses less fluoroscopy to achieve registration than NavX Fusion, but overall procedural times and clinical outcomes are similar.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalAdultAgedAtrial FibrillationBody Surface Potential MappingCatheter AblationConfidence IntervalsElectrocardiographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID22119854
PMCPMC3305875
OpenAlexW1995215653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.