Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22119845›Full record

ReviewBehavioural processes2012

Disentangling the nature of the nicotine stimulus.

Rick A Bevins, Scott T Barrett, Robert J Polewan, Steven T Pittenger, Natashia Swalve, Sergios Charntikov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioural processes, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The inside story: Interoceptive Pavlovian conditioning with the nicotine stimulus.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conditioned enhancement of the nicotine reinforcer.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid sensitization of physiological, neuronal, and locomotor effects of nicotine: critical role of peripheral drug actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rick A BevinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0308, USA. rbevins1@unl.edu
Scott T Barrett
Robert J Polewan
Steven T Pittenger
Natashia Swalve
Sergios Charntikov

Funding

Acquired Appetitive Properties of NicotineR01DA018114 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BEVINS, RICK A · 2004 to 2010
$1.4M
Altering nicotine reward through conditioningR21DA023951 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI BEVINS, RICK A · 2008 to 2009
$339k
NIDA NIH HHS DA018114NIDA NIH HHS DA023951NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018114NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA023951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning involving interoceptive stimuli likely plays an important role in many diseases and psychopathologies. Within this area, there has been extensive research investigating the interoceptive stimulus effects of abused drugs. In this pursuit, behavioral pharmacologists have taken advantage of what is known about learning processes and adapted the techniques to investigate the behavioral and receptor mechanisms of drug stimuli. Of particular interest is the nicotine stimulus and the use of the two-lever operant drug discrimination task and the Pavlovian drug discriminated goal-tracking task. There is strong concordance between the two methods when using "standard" testing protocols that minimize learning on test days. For example, ABT-418, nornicotine, and varenicline all fully evoked nicotine-appropriate responding. Notably, research from our laboratory with the discriminated goal-tracking task has used an alternative testing protocol. This protocol assesses stimulus substitution based on how well extinction learning using a non-nicotine ligand transfers back to the nicotine stimulus. These findings challenge conclusions based on more "standard" testing procedures (e.g., ABT-418 is not nicotine-like). As a starting point, we propose Thurstone scaling as a quantitative method for more precisely comparing transfer of extinction across doses, experiments, and investigators. We close with a discussion of future research directions and potential implications of the research for understanding interoceptive stimuli.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantDiscrimination LearningExtinction, PsychologicalNicotineNicotinic AgonistsTransfer, PsychologyNicotineNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID22119845
PMCPMC3413479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.