ArticleMethods in cell biology2011
Cell identification and cell lineage analysis.
Article in Methods in cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling pathway in hormonal cancer therapeutic resistance and lineage plasticity.Endocrinology · 2026Review
- Intraductal Injection of Adenoviruses to Perform Lineage Tracing in the Mammary Gland.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2025Review
- Quantifying Intracellular Particle Flows by DIC Object Tracking.Biophysical journal · 2021Article
- Developmental trajectory of Caenorhabditis elegans nervous system governs its structural organization.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Developmental Plasticity and Cellular Reprogramming inGenetics · 2019Review
- An Observation Data Driven Simulation and Analysis Framework for Early Stage C. elegans Embryogenesis.Journal of biomedical science and engineering · 2018Article
- Towards 3D in silico modeling of the sea urchin embryonic development.Journal of chemical biology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Caenorhabditis elegans is uniquely suited to the analysis of cell lineage patterns. C. elegans has a small number of somatic cells whose position and morphology are almost invariant from animal to animal. Because C. elegans is virtually transparent, cells can be identified in live animals using a simple bright-field microscopy technique, Nomarski differential interference contrast (DIC), or by expression of transgenic fluorescent reporter genes. The small size and rapid development of C. elegans mean that animals can develop while under continuous observation, allowing cell lineages to be analyzed throughout embryonic and postembryonic development. Embryonic cell lineages can also be traced semiautomatically using timelapse imaging of GFP-labeled nuclei. Analysis of mutant cell lineages remains important for defining the roles of developmental control genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.