Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012
Monthly administration of a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator provides efficient haemoglobin control in non-dialysis patients during routine clinical practice: results from the non-interventional, single-cohort, multicentre, SUPRA study.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biosimilar erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and the risk of developing anti-drug antibodies-a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2016Pooled it
- Subcutaneous C.E.R.A. for the Treatment of Chronic Renal Anemia in Predialysis Patients.Balkan medical journal · 2016Article
- Hemoglobin stability and patient satisfaction after switch to C.E.R.A. therapy: a multicenter, observational study.Clinical drug investigation · 2013Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) has a long half-life, a relatively low binding affinity for the erythropoiesis receptor and low systemic clearance. These characteristics permit once-monthly dosing, which could reduce staffing requirements and be advantageous for patients. However, outcomes observed during controlled trials of C.E.R.A. have not been assessed under everyday clinical conditions in which physicians make all therapeutic decisions based on their own experience, rather than according to a pre-defined protocol.
objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether the efficacy and safety of C.E.R.A. reported during controlled trials are reproducible under routine clinical conditions.
methodsThis was a non-interventional, single-cohort, multicentre study carried out in 92 specialist nephrology clinics and private practices in Germany. The study included patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease and anaemia, with or without current erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. C.E.R.A. initiation and dosing was at the discretion of the physician. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients for whom all measured haemoglobin (Hb) values during months 7-9 were within the range 11-12 g/dL ('responders').
results335 patients received ≥1 dose of C.E.R.A.; 150 had previously received ESA therapy. The mean number of doses was 7.6 per patient over a mean follow-up of 7.9 months. Mean ± SD Hb was 10.7 ± 1.1 g/dL at baseline and 11.3 ± 1.1 g/dL at the final visit (efficacy population, n = 205). The primary endpoint, all measured Hb values during months 7-9 within the range 11-12 g/dL, was achieved by 19.0% (39/205) of patients, increasing to 41.5% for Hb 11-13 g/dL, 42.0% for 10-12 g/dL and 76.6% for Hb ≥10 g/dL. Hb fluctuation during months 7-9 was ≤1 g/dL in 185/205 patients (90.2%). C.E.R.A. was well tolerated without novel safety concerns.
conclusionHb levels remained stable during routine use of C.E.R.A. in an unselected population of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anaemia. C.E.R.A. was administered approximately monthly compared with 3-7 doses per month on previous ESA therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22117178What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.