Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22117178›Full record

Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012

Monthly administration of a continuous erythropoietin receptor activator provides efficient haemoglobin control in non-dialysis patients during routine clinical practice: results from the non-interventional, single-cohort, multicentre, SUPRA study.

Stefan Heidenreich, Frank Leistikow, Stefan Zinn, Jörg Baumann, Andreas Atzeni, Vitomir Bajeski, Jörn Dietzmann, Gert-Peter Dragoun, SUPRA Study Group

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Stefan HeidenreichPraxis für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, Aachen, Germany. j.heidenreich@gmx.de
Frank Leistikow
Stefan Zinn
Jörg Baumann
Andreas Atzeni
Vitomir Bajeski
Jörn Dietzmann
Gert-Peter Dragoun
SUPRA Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe continuous erythropoietin receptor activator (C.E.R.A.) has a long half-life, a relatively low binding affinity for the erythropoiesis receptor and low systemic clearance. These characteristics permit once-monthly dosing, which could reduce staffing requirements and be advantageous for patients. However, outcomes observed during controlled trials of C.E.R.A. have not been assessed under everyday clinical conditions in which physicians make all therapeutic decisions based on their own experience, rather than according to a pre-defined protocol.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether the efficacy and safety of C.E.R.A. reported during controlled trials are reproducible under routine clinical conditions.

methodsThis was a non-interventional, single-cohort, multicentre study carried out in 92 specialist nephrology clinics and private practices in Germany. The study included patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease and anaemia, with or without current erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) therapy. C.E.R.A. initiation and dosing was at the discretion of the physician. The primary efficacy variable was the proportion of patients for whom all measured haemoglobin (Hb) values during months 7-9 were within the range 11-12 g/dL ('responders').

results335 patients received ≥1 dose of C.E.R.A.; 150 had previously received ESA therapy. The mean number of doses was 7.6 per patient over a mean follow-up of 7.9 months. Mean ± SD Hb was 10.7 ± 1.1 g/dL at baseline and 11.3 ± 1.1 g/dL at the final visit (efficacy population, n = 205). The primary endpoint, all measured Hb values during months 7-9 within the range 11-12 g/dL, was achieved by 19.0% (39/205) of patients, increasing to 41.5% for Hb 11-13 g/dL, 42.0% for 10-12 g/dL and 76.6% for Hb ≥10 g/dL. Hb fluctuation during months 7-9 was ≤1 g/dL in 185/205 patients (90.2%). C.E.R.A. was well tolerated without novel safety concerns.

conclusionHb levels remained stable during routine use of C.E.R.A. in an unselected population of non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anaemia. C.E.R.A. was administered approximately monthly compared with 3-7 doses per month on previous ESA therapy.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAnemiaChronic DiseaseErythropoietinFemaleGermanyHematinicsHemoglobinsHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPolyethylene GlycolsReproducibility of Resultscontinuous erythropoietin receptor activatorErythropoietinHematinicsHemoglobinsPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.