Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22117096›Full record

Trial reportDrugs & aging2011

Is there a predictive profile for clinical inertia in hypertensive patients? An observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study.

Vicente Gil-Guillén, Domingo Orozco-Beltrán, Emilio Márquez-Contreras, Ramón Durazo-Arvizu, Richard Cooper, Salvador Pita-Fernández, Diego González-Segura, Concepción Carratalá-Munuera, José Luis Martín de Pablo, Vicente Pallarés and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drugs & aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01826929 (Effectiveness of a New Health Care Organization Model in Primary Care for Chronic Cardiovascular Disease Patients Based on a Multifactorial Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01826929 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a New Health Care Organization Model in Primary Care for Chronic Cardiovascular Disease Patients Based on a Multifactorial Intervention: The PROPRESE Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2013Enrolled300ConditionsIschemic Heart DiseaseArmsTherapeutic education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vicente Gil-GuillénMiguel Hernandez University, San Juan de Alicante, Spain. atencion.primaria@umh.es
Domingo Orozco-Beltrán
Emilio Márquez-Contreras
Ramón Durazo-Arvizu
Richard Cooper
Salvador Pita-Fernández
Diego González-Segura
Concepción Carratalá-Munuera
José Luis Martín de Pablo
Vicente Pallarés
Salvador Pertusa-Martínez
Antonio Fernández
Josep Redón
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESLoyola University Chicago · USSpanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESUniversidade da Coruña · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome studies have described a large number of hypertensive patients who are followed by a primary care physician without achieving adequate blood pressure (BP) control but whose treatment nevertheless is not intensified. It is not known whether physicians are aware of this clinical inertia and what factors are associated with this problem.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the factors associated with clinical inertia in hypertensive patients.

methodsThis was an observational, cross-sectional, multicentre study conducted in a network of primary care centres and hospital hypertension units in Spain. Using a consecutive sampling approach, 512 physicians selected 5077 hypertensive patients in whom they suspected poor BP control after chart review. The main variables documented were BP control and cardiovascular risk according to European Society of Hypertension guidelines, changes in treatment after visit, type of treatment, and healthcare setting. A binomial logistic regression multivariate analysis, adjusted for physician, was performed.

resultsOf the selected patients, 70.9% had poor BP control according to measurements taken in the physician's office, and in 1499 (42.1%) of those poorly controlled patients, treatment was not intensified (clinical inertia). Factors associated with clinical inertia were as follows: being seen at a primary care centre (p < 0.001), not having left ventricular hypertrophy (p < 0.001) or microalbuminuria (p < 0.001), taking fixed-dose (p = 0.049) or free-dose (p = 0.001) combination therapy, BP measured in other settings (nurse's office, patient's home) than the physician's office (p = 0.034) or the pharmacy (p = 0.019), older age (p = 0.032), and lower systolic (p < 0.001) and diastolic (p < 0.001) BP. Of the hypertensive patients with clinical inertia, 90.2% (95% CI 88.7, 91.7) had high cardiovascular risk.

conclusionsClinical inertia was associated with a profile that included older age, lack of co-morbid conditions and being seen at a primary care centre.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedTreatment FailureYoung AdultAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22117096
OpenAlexW73374059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.