Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22116780›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2011

Molecular Mechanics Investigation of an Adenine-Adenine Non-Canonical Pair Conformational Change.

Keith P Van Nostrand, Scott D Kennedy, Douglas H Turner, David H Mathews

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reparameterization of the Amber RNA Force Field Non-Bonded Terms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Dynamical Signatures of Multifunnel Energy Landscapes.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Blind tests of RNA nearest-neighbor energy prediction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Keith P Van NostrandThe Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 712, Rochester, New York 14642.
Scott D Kennedy
Douglas H Turner
David H Mathews
University of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

KINETIC AND SPECTROSCOPIC STUDIES OF NUCLEIC ACIDSR01GM022939 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI TURNER, DOUGLAS H. · 1985 to 2016
$7.6M
Innovations in RNA Structure PredictionR01HG004002 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MATHEWS, DAVID H. · 2007 to 2011
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004002NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM022939
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conformational changes are important in RNA for binding and catalysis and understanding these changes is important for understanding how RNA functions. Computational techniques using all-atom molecular models can be used to characterize conformational changes in RNA. These techniques are applied to an RNA conformational change involving a single base pair within a nine base pair RNA duplex. The Adenine-Adenine (AA) non-canonical pair in the sequence 5'GGUGAAGGCU3' paired with 3'PCCGAAGCCG5', where P is Purine, undergoes conformational exchange between two conformations on the timescale of tens of microseconds, as demonstrated in a previous NMR solution structure [Chen, G., et al., Biochemistry, 2006. 45: 6889-903]. The more populated, major, conformation was estimated to be 0.5 to 1.3 kcal/mol more stable at 30 °C than the less populated, minor, conformation. Both conformations are trans-Hoogsteen/sugar edge pairs, where the interacting edges on the adenines change with the conformational change. Targeted Molecular Dynamics (TMD) and Nudged Elastic Band (NEB) were used to model the pathway between the major and minor conformations using the AMBER software package. The adenines were predicted to change conformation via intermediates in which they are stacked as opposed to hydrogen-bonded. The predicted pathways can be described by an improper dihedral angle reaction coordinate. Umbrella sampling along the reaction coordinate was performed to model the free energy profile for the conformational change using a total of 1800 ns of sampling. Although the barrier height between the major and minor conformations was reasonable, the free energy difference between the major and minor conformations was the opposite of that expected based on the NMR experiments. Variations in the force field applied did not improve the misrepresentation of the free energies of the major and minor conformations. As an alternative, the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MMPBSA) approximation was applied to predict free energy differences between the two conformations using a total of 800 ns of sampling. MM-PBSA also incorrectly predicted the major conformation to be higher in free energy than the minor conformation.

Identifiers

PMID22116780
PMCPMC3221466
OpenAlexW2050292242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.