Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22116778›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2012

Validation of a novel method for retrospectively estimating nutrient intake during pregnancy using a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire.

Fabiola Mejía-Rodríguez, Manuela A Orjuela, Armando García-Guerra, Amado David Quezada-Sanchez, Lynnette M Neufeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Fabiola Mejía-RodríguezCentro de Investigación en Nutrición y Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP), Av. Universidad 655, Santa María Ahuacatitlán Cerrada, Los Pinos y Caminera, 62508 Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico. fmejia@correo.insp.mx
Manuela A Orjuela
Armando García-Guerra
Amado David Quezada-Sanchez
Lynnette M Neufeld
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública · MXColumbia University · USNutrition International · CA

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ami R Zota · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Folate Deficiency, Metabolism &Sporadic RetinoblastomaR01CA098180 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ORJUELA, MANUELA A · 2003 to 2006
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA98180NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098180NIEHS NIH HHS ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Case control studies evaluating the relationship between dietary intake of specific nutrients and risk of congenital, neonatal or early childhood disease require the ability to rank relative maternal dietary intake during pregnancy. Such studies are limited by the lack of validated instruments for assessing gestational dietary intake several years post-partum. This study aims to validate a semi-quantitative interview-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for retrospectively estimating nutrient intake at two critical time points during pregnancy. The FFQ was administered to women (N = 84), who 4-6 years earlier had participated in a prospective study to evaluate dietary intake during pregnancy. The FFQ queried participants about intake during the previous month (FFQ-month). This was then used as a reference point to estimate consumption by trimester (FFQ-pregnancy). The resulting data were compared to data collected during the original study from two 24-h recalls (24 h-original) using Spearman correlation and Wilcoxon sign-rank-test. Total energy intake as estimated by the retrospective and original instruments did not differ and was only weakly correlated in the trimesters (1st and 3rd) as a whole (r = 0.18-32), though more strongly correlated when restricted to the first half of the 1st trimester (r = 0.32) and later half of the 3rd trimester (r = 0.87). After energy adjustment, correlation between the 24hR-original and FFQ-pregnancy in the 3rd trimester were r = 0.25 (P < 0.05) for dietary intake of vitamin A, and r = 0.26 (P < 0.05) for folate, and r = 0.23-0.77 (P < 0.005) for folate, and vitamins A, B6 and B12 in the 1st and 3rd trimester after including vitamin supplement intake. The FFQ-pregnancy provides a consistent estimate of maternal intake of key micronutrients during pregnancy and permits accurate ranking of intake 4-6 years post-partum.

Indexed as

Energy IntakeNutrition AssessmentAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexDiet RecordsFemaleHumansMental RecallMicronutrientsPregnancyRegression AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySocioeconomic FactorsMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID22116778
PMCPMC3311715
OpenAlexW2044574213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.