ArticleWorld journal of urology2012
Familial risk and familial survival in prostate cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human papillomavirus and prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2023Pooled it
- Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Assessment of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2019Pooled it
- First-degree family history of breast cancer is associated with prostate cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2019Pooled it
- 'Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator' mobile applications (Apps): a systematic review and scoring using the validated user version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (uMARS).World journal of urology · 2018Pooled it
- Association between HIF1A rs11549465 polymorphism and risk of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Pooled it
- Enzalutamide Plus ADT for the Treatment of mHSPC: Real-World Evidence from a Bulgarian Cohort.Cancers · 2026Article
- Patients with high-risk features on active surveillance for prostate cancer.Prostate international · 2026Review
- Early-Onset Prostate Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Biology, Clinical Features, Management, and Early Detection.MedComm · 2026Review
- Transcriptome-wide association studies implicate RCC1 and PHACTR4 in prostate cancer survival.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Hereditary Prostate Cancer Risk Management: An Evidence-Based Summary to Inform Nursing Practice.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Proteome-wide association study of prostate cancer risk across populations.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Monoclonal Gammopathy Prevalence in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients: A Correlative Perspective Observational Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Screening and validation of key genes involved in castration-resistant prostate cancer based on transcriptomics sequencing.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biochemical and Histological Characterization of Sorcin Overexpression in Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Integrating BRCA testing into routine prostate cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach by SIUrO and other Italian Scientific Societies.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Polygenic risk and rare variant gene clustering enhance cancer risk stratification for breast and prostate cancers.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Predictive value of polygenic risk score for prostate cancer incidence and prognosis in the Han Chinese.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Astragaloside Ⅳ mediates the effect and mechanism of KPNB1 on biological behavior and tumor growth in prostate cancer.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Causal relationship between prostatic diseases and prostate cancer: a mendelian randomization study.BMC cancer · 2024Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe Swedish Family-Cancer Database has been the major source of population-based prospective data on familial risks on most cancers, including prostate cancer. In the present review, I focus on three lines of family studies with novel results.
methodsThe covered studies originate from the same database with publication dates spanning a period of somewhat over 3 years. Age-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of incident prostate cancer and fatal prostate cancer were determined according to the number of affected relatives. Cumulative risks for incidence and death were calculated for the various types of families. Finally, data on the familial association of prostate cancer with some other cancers were reviewed.
resultsIf the father had prostate cancer, the HR for sons was 2.1 and it increased to 17.7 when three brothers were affected. The highest HR (23) was observed for men before age 60 years with three affected brothers. The patterns for fatal familial prostate cancer were similar. Other reviewed sets of data showed evidence for the familial concordance of good and poor survival in prostate cancer. Familial risks were somewhat higher for fatal than for incident prostate cancer, suggesting that fatal prostate cancers may be a genetic subgroup.
conclusionsConsidering the high familial risks in fatal prostate cancer, family history remains an important prognostic piece of information useful for clinical genetic counseling. Obviously, preventive measures for at-risk men are needed but these are beyond the present paper. Starting screening before any prostate cancers are diagnosed in a family appears counterproductive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.