Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22116539›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2012

Shrinking, widening, reversing, and stagnating trends in US socioeconomic inequities in cancer mortality for the total, black, and white populations: 1960-2006.

Nancy Krieger, Jarvis T Chen, Anna Kosheleva, Pamela D Waterman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Race, Ethnicity, and Self-Rated Health Among Immigrants in the United States.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nancy KriegerDepartment of Society, Human Development and Health (SHDH), Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH), Boston, MA 02115, USA. nkrieger@hsph.harvard.edu
Jarvis T Chen
Anna Kosheleva
Pamela D Waterman

Funding

Statistical Methods for Analysis of Massive Genetic and Genomic Data in Cancer ResearchR35CA197449 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI XIHONG LIN · 2015 to 2026
$10.9M
Statistical Methods for the Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Social Disparities in CancerP01CA134294 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI COULL, BRENT ANDREW, DOMINICI, FRANCESCA · 2008 to 2017
$6.8M
CANCER AND CHANGING TRENDS IN US MORTALITY INEQUITIES: 1960-2004R03CA137666 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI KRIEGER, NANCY · 2009 to 2010
$164k
NCI NIH HHS 1R03CA137666NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134294NCI NIH HHS R03 CA137666NCI NIH HHS R35 CA197449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives of studyTo test recent claims that cancer inequities are bound to increase as population health improves.

methodsWe analyzed 1960-2006 age-standardized US county cancer mortality data, total and site-specific (lung, prostate, colorectal, breast, cervix, stomach), stratified by county income quintile for the US total, black, and white populations.

resultsBetween 1960 and 2006, US socioeconomic inequities in cancer mortality variously shrunk, widened, reversed, and stagnated, depending on time period and cancer site. For all cancers combined and most, but not all, sites, absolute, but not relative, socioeconomic gaps were greater for the black compared to white population. Compared to the yearly age-specific mortality rates among whites in the most affluent counties, the percent of excess cancer deaths among whites in the lower four county income quintiles first rose above 0 in 1990 and in 2006 equaled 5.4% (95% CI 4.8, 6.0); among blacks, it rose from 6.0% (95% CI 4.5, 7.4) in 1960 to 24.7% (95% CI 23.9, 25.5) in 1990 and remained at this level through 2006.

conclusionsThe hypothesis that cancer mortality inequities are bound to increase is refuted by long-term data on total and site-specific cancer mortality stratified by socioeconomic position and race/ethnicity.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID22116539
PMCPMC3262111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.