ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2012
Age effect on whole blood cyclosporine concentrations following oral administration in children with nephrotic syndrome.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclosporine C2 monitoring for the treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children: a multicenter randomized phase II trial.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2014Trial
- Cyclosporine A CClinical and experimental nephrology · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and nephrotoxicity of a 2-year medium dose of cyclosporine in pediatric patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: determination of the need for follow-up kidney biopsy.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate age-related pharmacokinetic differences of cyclosporine (CyA) in children with nephrotic syndrome. Whole blood concentrations of CyA were monitored for a total of 96 times in 36 cases. The 25 male and 11 female patients ranged in age from 1.9 to 19.7 years with a mean age of 9.1 years. Renal biopsy showed minimal change in 33 patients and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in three patients. CyA was orally administered in two divided doses just before meals. The doses of CyA administered were adjusted such that the target value for blood concentration at 2 h post-dose (C2) was 400-450 ng/ml. The 96 subjects were divided into three groups according to age: group I, 1-5 years (n = 30); group II, 6-10 years (n = 34); and group III, ≥ 11 years (n = 32). In all subjects, peak levels (Cmax) of CyA were reached at C1 or C2. There was no significant difference between the groups for C2, area under the whole blood concentration-time curve up to 4 h post-dose (AUC0-4), and Cmax. The mean CyA doses of groups I, II, and III were 4.8 ± 1.0 mg/kg/day, 3.8 ± 0.9 mg/kg/day, and 3.0 ± 0.6 mg/kg/day, respectively, and there were significant differences between every two groups. In addition, the dose-normalized Cmax (Cmax/dose) and AUC0-4 (AUC0-4/dose) values were significantly lower in the younger group than in the older group. These findings suggested that in children, when the same concentration is targeted, the required CyA dose would vary according to age but would be significantly higher for the younger children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.