Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22116043›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2012

The dark side of neuroplasticity.

Arthur Brown, Lynne C Weaver

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of neuromodulation and rehabilitation approaches on pain relief in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Chronic, complete cervicalJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Arthur BrownSpinal Cord Injury Laboratory, Robarts Research Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. abrown@robarts.ca
Lynne C Weaver
Robarts Clinical Trials · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR 86654-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether dramatic or modest, recovery of neurological function after spinal cord injury (SCI) is greatly due to neuroplasticity--the process by which the nervous system responds to injury by establishing new synaptic connections or by altering the strength of existing synapses. However, the same neuroplasticity that allows locomotor function to recover also produces negative consequences such as pain and dysfunction of organs controlled by the autonomic nervous system. In this review we focus specifically on structural neuroplasticity (the growth of new synaptic connections) after SCI and on the consequent development of pain and autonomic dysreflexia, a condition of episodic hypertension. Neuroplasticity after SCI is stimulated by the deafferentation of spinal neurons below the lesion and by the expression of growth-promoting neurotrophins such as nerve growth factor (NGF). A broad range of therapeutic strategies that affect neuroplasticity is being developed for the treatment of SCI. At one end of the spectrum are therapeutic strategies that directly or indirectly increase NGF in the injured spinal cord, and have the most robust effects on neuroplasticity. At the other end of the spectrum are neuroprotective strategies focused on supporting and rescuing uninjured, or partially injured, axons; these might limit the deafferentation stimulus for neuroplasticity. In the middle of this spectrum are strategies that block axon growth inhibitors without necessarily providing a growth stimulus. The literature supports the view that the negative consequences of neuroplasticity develop more commonly with therapies that directly stimulate nerve growth than they develop in the untreated injured cord. Compared to these conditions, neuroplasticity with negative outcomes is less prevalent after treatments that that neutralize axon growth inhibitors, and least apparent after strategies that promote neuroprotection.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutonomic DysreflexiaAxonsNeuronal PlasticityPainReflex, AbnormalSpinal Cord Injuries

Identifiers

PMID22116043
PMCPMC4851547
OpenAlexW2113732155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.