ArticleLancet (London, England)2011
Statins and safety: can we finally be reassured?
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Berberine signature and cardiometabolic diseases using randomized controlled trial, cohort study and Mendelian randomization.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Using proteomics to identify the mechanisms underlying the benefits of statins on ischemic heart disease.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2024Article
- Health Outcomes of Population-Based Pharmacy Outreach to Increase Statin Use for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Diabetes.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016Article
- Clinician's guide to the updated ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Review
- A clinician's guide to the ABCs of cardiovascular disease prevention: the Johns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease and American College of Cardiology Cardiosource Approach to the Million Hearts Initiative.Clinical cardiology · 2013Review
- Fat-free mass and fasting glucose values in patients with and without statin therapy assigned to age groups between <60 and >75 years.Obesity facts · 2013Article
- The importance of matching language to type of evidence: avoiding the pitfalls of reporting outcomes data.Clinical cardiology · 2012Article
- Individualized risk for statin-induced myopathy: current knowledge, emerging challenges and potential solutions.Pharmacogenomics · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22115875What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.