Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2011
Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care.
Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Interactive Preventive Health Record (IPHR) to Promote Patient-Centered Preventive Care
Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer Screening
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Impact of Patient Access to Electronic Health Records on Health Care Engagement: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating health service outcomes of public involvement in health service design in high-income countries: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- What Do Patients and Caregivers Want? A Systematic Review of User Suggestions to Improve Patient Portals.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2020Pooled it
- MyPreventiveCare: implementation and dissemination of an interactive preventive health record in three practice-based research networks serving disadvantaged patients--a randomized cluster trial.Implementation science : IS · 2014Trial
- Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2013Trial
- Personal health records: a randomized trial of effects on elder medication safety.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIATrial
- Processes for Developing Plain Language Versions of Guidelines Recommendations: A Scoping Review.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- A randomized controlled trial to evaluate innovative decision support in the context of fall prevention.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Associations between blood pressure control and clinical events suggestive of nutrition care documented in electronic health records of patients with hypertension.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Useful Taxonomy of Patient Portals Based on Characteristics of Patient Engagement.Methods of information in medicine · 2021Article
- I am ready to see you now, Doctor! A mixed-method study of the Let's Discuss Health website implementation in Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Article
- Using Patient and Family Engagement Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Health Information Technology Initiatives: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Identifying Attrition Phases in Survey Data: Applicability and Assessment Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Article
- Designing health information technology tools for behavioral health clinicians integrated within a primary care team.Journal of innovation in health informatics · 2018Article
- Secure Cloud-Based EHR System Using Attribute-Based Cryptosystem and Blockchain.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
- Making it work for me: beliefs about making a personal health record relevant and useable.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Engaging Patients in Decisions About Cancer Screening: Exploring the Decision Journey Through the Use of a Patient Portal.American journal of preventive medicine · 2018Article
- Patient Health Record Systems Scope and Functionalities: Literature Review and Future Directions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Review
- Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based preventive services offer profound health benefits, yet Americans receive only half of indicated care. A variety of government and specialty society policy initiatives are promoting the adoption of information technologies to engage patients in their care, such as personal health records, but current systems may not utilize the technology's full potential.
methodsUsing a previously described model to make information technology more patient-centered, we developed an interactive preventive health record (IPHR) designed to more deeply engage patients in preventive care and health promotion. We recruited 14 primary care practices to promote the IPHR to all adult patients and sought practice and patient input in designing the IPHR to ensure its usability, salience, and generalizability. The input involved patient usability tests, practice workflow observations, learning collaboratives, and patient feedback. Use of the IPHR was measured using practice appointment and IPHR databases.
resultsThe IPHR that emerged from this process generates tailored patient recommendations based on guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other organizations. It extracts clinical data from the practices' electronic medical record and obtains health risk assessment information from patients. Clinical content is translated and explained in lay language. Recommendations review the benefits and uncertainties of services and possible actions for patients and clinicians. Embedded in recommendations are self management tools, risk calculators, decision aids, and community resources--selected to match patient's clinical circumstances. Within six months, practices had encouraged 14.4% of patients to use the IPHR (ranging from 1.5% to 28.3% across the 14 practices). Practices successfully incorporated the IPHR into workflow, using it to prepare patients for visits, augment health behavior counseling, explain test results, automatically issue patient reminders for overdue services, prompt clinicians about needed services, and formulate personalized prevention plans.
conclusionsThe IPHR demonstrates that a patient-centered personal health record that interfaces with the electronic medical record can give patients a high level of individualized guidance and be successfully adopted by busy primary care practices. Further study and refinement are necessary to make information systems even more patient-centered and to demonstrate their impact on care.
trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00589173.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.