Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22115059›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical informatics and decision making2011

Designing a patient-centered personal health record to promote preventive care.

Alex H Krist, Eric Peele, Steven H Woolf, Stephen F Rothemich, John F Loomis, Daniel R Longo, Anton J Kuzel

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00589173 nacompletednot on this map

An Interactive Preventive Health Record (IPHR) to Promote Patient-Centered Preventive Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2007 to 2011Enrolled5,500ConditionsPreventionArmsInteractive Preventive Health Record (IPHR), "Standard" preventive care
NCT02138448 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Commonwealth UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled46ConditionsCancer, Health PromotionArmsInteractive Preventive Health Record
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Personal health records: a randomized trial of effects on elder medication safety.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. I am ready to see you now, Doctor! A mixed-method study of the Let's Discuss Health website implementation in Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Shared decision-making using personal health record technology: a scoping review at the crossroads.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex H KristDepartment of Family Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA. ahkrist@vcu.edu
Eric Peele
Steven H Woolf
Stephen F Rothemich
John F Loomis
Daniel R Longo
Anton J Kuzel

Funding

Implementing Personal Health Records to Promote Evidence-Based Cancer ScreeningR01CA168795 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2013 to 2017
$3.0M
An Interactive Preventive Health Record (IPHR) to Promote Patient-Centered CareR18HS017046 · AHRQ · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2007 to 2009
$1.2M
Promoting Use of an Integrated Personal Health Record for PreventionR21HS018811 · AHRQ · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KRIST, ALEXANDER H · 2010 to 2011
$294k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS17046-01AHRQ HHS R21 HS018811-01NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based preventive services offer profound health benefits, yet Americans receive only half of indicated care. A variety of government and specialty society policy initiatives are promoting the adoption of information technologies to engage patients in their care, such as personal health records, but current systems may not utilize the technology's full potential.

methodsUsing a previously described model to make information technology more patient-centered, we developed an interactive preventive health record (IPHR) designed to more deeply engage patients in preventive care and health promotion. We recruited 14 primary care practices to promote the IPHR to all adult patients and sought practice and patient input in designing the IPHR to ensure its usability, salience, and generalizability. The input involved patient usability tests, practice workflow observations, learning collaboratives, and patient feedback. Use of the IPHR was measured using practice appointment and IPHR databases.

resultsThe IPHR that emerged from this process generates tailored patient recommendations based on guidelines from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other organizations. It extracts clinical data from the practices' electronic medical record and obtains health risk assessment information from patients. Clinical content is translated and explained in lay language. Recommendations review the benefits and uncertainties of services and possible actions for patients and clinicians. Embedded in recommendations are self management tools, risk calculators, decision aids, and community resources--selected to match patient's clinical circumstances. Within six months, practices had encouraged 14.4% of patients to use the IPHR (ranging from 1.5% to 28.3% across the 14 practices). Practices successfully incorporated the IPHR into workflow, using it to prepare patients for visits, augment health behavior counseling, explain test results, automatically issue patient reminders for overdue services, prompt clinicians about needed services, and formulate personalized prevention plans.

conclusionsThe IPHR demonstrates that a patient-centered personal health record that interfaces with the electronic medical record can give patients a high level of individualized guidance and be successfully adopted by busy primary care practices. Further study and refinement are necessary to make information systems even more patient-centered and to demonstrate their impact on care.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00589173.

Indexed as

Diffusion of InnovationPatient-Centered CarePreventive Health ServicesAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGuidelines as TopicHealth PromotionHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMedical History TakingMedical Record LinkageMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22115059
PMCPMC3250934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.