ArticleArchives of psychiatric nursing2011
Shared decision making in mental health treatment: qualitative findings from stakeholder focus groups.
Article in Archives of psychiatric nursing, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Shifting Perspectives on the Challenges of Shared Decision Making in Mental Health Care.Community mental health journal · 2024Pooled it
- Mental health professionals' perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- From Idealist to Realist-Designing and Implementing Shared Decision-Making Interventions in the Choice of Antipsychotic Prescription in People Living with Psychosis (SHAPE): A Realist Review.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Review
- Review
- A Nursing Process for Shared Decision-Making for Patients with Severe Mental Illness Receiving Treatment Involving Long-Term Coercive Measures: A Modified Grounded Theory Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Stakeholder perspectives on adjunctive mHealth services during transitions of care for patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders.Journal of mental health (Abingdon, England) · 2024Article
- Cannabis Use and Its Impact on Mental Health in Youth in Australia and the United States: A Scoping Review.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Vulnerability in practice: Peeling back the layers, avoiding triggers, and preventing cascading effects.Bioethics · 2022Article
- Perspectives of Patients and Providers in Using Shared Decision Making in Psychiatry.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.BJPsych open · 2021Article
- Computerized Conjoint Analysis of the Weight Treatment Preferences of Individuals With Schizophrenia.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Barriers and Enablers to Shared Decision Making in Psychiatric Medication Management: A Qualitative Investigation of Clinician and Service Users' Views.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Shared decision making for adults with severe mental illness: A concept analysis.Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS · 2020Review
- 'It's my home and your work': the views of a filmed vignette describing a challenging everyday situation from the perspective of people with intellectual disabilities.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2018Article
- Implementing CommonGround in a community mental health center: Lessons in a computerized decision support system.Psychiatric rehabilitation journal · 2018Article
- Care pathways in the transition of patients between district psychiatric hospital centres (DPCs) and community mental health services.Health science reports · 2018Article
- Qualitative systematic review of barriers and facilitators to patient-involved antipsychotic prescribing.BJPsych open · 2018Article
- Disseminating the Results of a Depression Management Study in an Urban Alaska Native Health Care System.American Indian and Alaska native mental health research (Online) · 2018Article
- Effective Strategies for Nurses Empowering Clients With Schizophrenia: Medication Use as a Tool in Recovery.Issues in mental health nursing · 2016Article
- Justifying medication decisions in mental health care: Psychiatrists' accounts for treatment recommendations.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis article reports on findings from seven stakeholder focus groups conducted in exploring shared decision making (SDM) between provider and consumer in mental health (MH) treatment in public MH. BASIC PROCEDURES: Seven focus groups were conducted with stakeholders-consumers, family members, prescribers, MH clinicians, and rural providers. Each of the focus groups was recorded digitally, transcribed into text, and analyzed qualitatively for recurring themes. MAIN
findingsProvider barriers to SDM include history of the medical model, MH crises, lack of system support, and time. Consumer-related barriers included consumer competency, fears, insight, literacy, and trauma from past experiences. Information-exchange issues include consumer passivity, whether consumers could be viewed as experts, and importance of adequate history information. New skills needed to practice SDM included provider's knowledge about alternative treatments, mastery of person-first language, and listening skills; consumer's ability to articulate their expert information; and computer skills for both providers and consumers. Outcomes expected from practice of SDM include greater sharing of power between provider and consumer, greater follow-through with treatment plans, greater self-management on the part of consumers, and improved therapeutic alliances. PRINCIPAL
conclusionsImplementing SDM in public MH will impact consumers and their families, providers, prescribers, and administrators. More SDM trials in public MH are needed to answer some of the many questions that remain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.