Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22114729›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Modulations of the chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome in response to anticoccidial and growth promoter treatment.

Jessica L Danzeisen, Hyeun Bum Kim, Richard E Isaacson, Zheng Jin Tu, Timothy J Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 184 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
184citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
20.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

184 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 373 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A century of "anticoccidial drugs": bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Activity of Lysozyme Against Multidrug-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

124 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica L DanzeisenDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States of America.
Hyeun Bum Kim
Richard E Isaacson
Zheng Jin Tu
Timothy J Johnson
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increasing pressures to reduce or eliminate the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion purposes in production animals, there is a growing need to better understand the effects elicited by these agents in order to identify alternative approaches that might be used to maintain animal health. Antibiotic usage at subtherapeutic levels is postulated to confer a number of modulations in the microbes within the gut that ultimately result in growth promotion and reduced occurrence of disease. This study examined the effects of the coccidiostat monensin and the growth promoters virginiamycin and tylosin on the broiler chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome. Using a longitudinal design, cecal contents of commercial chickens were extracted and examined using 16S rRNA and total DNA shotgun metagenomic pyrosequencing. A number of genus-level enrichments and depletions were observed in response to monensin alone, or monensin in combination with virginiamycin or tylosin. Of note, monensin effects included depletions of Roseburia, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus, and enrichments in Coprococcus and Anaerofilum. The most notable effect observed in the monensin/virginiamycin and monensin/tylosin treatments, but not in the monensin-alone treatments, was enrichments in Escherichia coli. Analysis of the metagenomic dataset identified enrichments in transport system genes, type I fimbrial genes, and type IV conjugative secretion system genes. No significant differences were observed with regard to antimicrobial resistance gene counts. Overall, this study provides a more comprehensive glimpse of the chicken cecum microbial community, the modulations of this community in response to growth promoters, and targets for future efforts to mimic these effects using alternative approaches.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaCecumChickensCoccidiostatsColony Count, MicrobialDNA, BacterialDrug CombinationsMetagenomeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMonensinPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16STylosinVirginiamycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoccidiostatsDNA, BacterialDrug CombinationsMonensinRNA, Ribosomal, 16STylosinVirginiamycin

Identifiers

PMID22114729
PMCPMC3218064
OpenAlexW2090907793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.