Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22114503›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2011

Validity of bioconjugated silica nanoparticles in comparison with direct smear, culture, and polymerase chain reaction for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum specimens.

Alireza Ekrami, Ali Reza Samarbaf-Zadeh, Azar Khosravi, Behrooz Zargar, Mohamad Alavi, Mansor Amin, Alireza Kiasat

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Silica Nanoparticles.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of sandwich-form biosensor to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in clinical sputum specimens.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alireza EkramiInfectious and Tropical Diseases Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. aekrami@yahoo.com
Ali Reza Samarbaf-Zadeh
Azar Khosravi
Behrooz Zargar
Mohamad Alavi
Mansor Amin
Alireza Kiasat
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis is a public health problem worldwide, and new easy to perform diagnostic methods with high accuracy are necessary for optimal control of the disease. Recently, fluorescent silica nanoparticles (FSNP) has attracted immense interest for the detection of pathogenic microorganisms. The aim of this study was to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in clinical samples using bioconjugated FSNP compared with microscopic examination, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nested PCR, and culture as the gold standard.

methodsIn total, 152 sputum specimens were obtained from patients who were suspected to have pulmonary tuberculosis. All samples were examined by the four techniques described.

resultsThe assay showed 97.1% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 91-99.2) and 91.35% specificity (CI 78.3-97.1). Furthermore, assays using variable bacterial concentrations indicated that 100 colony forming units/mL of M. tuberculosis could be detected. There were no differences between the results obtained from two types of mouse monoclonal antibody against Hsp-65 and 16 KDa antigens.

conclusionWe performed this assay in a large number of clinical samples to confirm the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the test and can recommend its application for diagnosis of M. tuberculosis. We believe that this method is more convenient for routine diagnosis of M. tuberculosis in sputum and will be more easily applicable in the field, and with sufficient sensitivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalBacteriological TechniquesColony Count, MicrobialDNA, BacterialFluorescent Antibody TechniqueFluorescent DyesHumansMiceMycobacterium tuberculosisNanoparticlesParticle SizePolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, MonoclonalDNA, BacterialFluorescent DyesSilicon Dioxidebioconjugationfluorescent silica nanoparticlesIS6110Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID22114503
PMCPMC3218586
OpenAlexW2092533013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.