Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22114356›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2012

A consistent phylogenetic backbone for the fungi.

Ingo Ebersberger, Ricardo de Matos Simoes, Anne Kupczok, Matthias Gube, Erika Kothe, Kerstin Voigt, Arndt von Haeseler

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
16.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. OMICS and Other Advanced Technologies in Mycological Applications.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Fungal evolution: cellular, genomic and metabolic complexity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anaerobic Fungi: Past, Present, and Future.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
  14. Fungal evolution: diversity, taxonomy and phylogeny of the Fungi.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Enzymes of early-diverging, zoosporic fungi.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ingo EbersbergerCenter for Integrative Bioinformatics Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria. ingo.ebersberger@univie.ac.at
Ricardo de Matos Simoes
Anne Kupczok
Matthias Gube
Erika Kothe
Kerstin Voigt
Arndt von Haeseler
Friedrich Schiller University Jena · DEInstitute of Science and Technology Austria · ATLeibniz-Institut für Naturstoff-Forschung und Infektionsbiologie e. V. - Hans-Knöll-Institut (HKI) · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The kingdom of fungi provides model organisms for biotechnology, cell biology, genetics, and life sciences in general. Only when their phylogenetic relationships are stably resolved, can individual results from fungal research be integrated into a holistic picture of biology. However, and despite recent progress, many deep relationships within the fungi remain unclear. Here, we present the first phylogenomic study of an entire eukaryotic kingdom that uses a consistency criterion to strengthen phylogenetic conclusions. We reason that branches (splits) recovered with independent data and different tree reconstruction methods are likely to reflect true evolutionary relationships. Two complementary phylogenomic data sets based on 99 fungal genomes and 109 fungal expressed sequence tag (EST) sets analyzed with four different tree reconstruction methods shed light from different angles on the fungal tree of life. Eleven additional data sets address specifically the phylogenetic position of Blastocladiomycota, Ustilaginomycotina, and Dothideomycetes, respectively. The combined evidence from the resulting trees supports the deep-level stability of the fungal groups toward a comprehensive natural system of the fungi. In addition, our analysis reveals methodologically interesting aspects. Enrichment for EST encoded data-a common practice in phylogenomic analyses-introduces a strong bias toward slowly evolving and functionally correlated genes. Consequently, the generalization of phylogenomic data sets as collections of randomly selected genes cannot be taken for granted. A thorough characterization of the data to assess possible influences on the tree reconstruction should therefore become a standard in phylogenomic analyses.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomicsPhylogenyBayes TheoremDatabases, GeneticExpressed Sequence TagsFungiGenome, FungalModels, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID22114356
PMCPMC3339314
OpenAlexW2143319834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.