Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22114198›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Trypanosoma cruzi as an effective cancer antigen delivery vector.

Caroline Junqueira, Luara I Santos, Bruno Galvão-Filho, Santuza M Teixeira, Flávia G Rodrigues, Wanderson D DaRocha, Egler Chiari, Achim A Jungbluth, Gerd Ritter, Sacha Gnjatic and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. The time has come for a vaccine against Chagas disease.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025
    Review
  7. Kharon Is Crucial forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Parasites revive hope for cancer therapy.European journal of medical research · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Cytotoxic Effect ofAdvances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A novel enemy of cancer: recent investigations into protozoan anti-tumor properties.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  15. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  16. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Anti-Tumor Effect of Parasitic Protozoans.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Synergy betweenJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline JunqueiraDepartamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Luara I Santos
Bruno Galvão-Filho
Santuza M Teixeira
Flávia G Rodrigues
Wanderson D DaRocha
Egler Chiari
Achim A Jungbluth
Gerd Ritter
Sacha Gnjatic
Lloyd J Old
Ricardo T Gazzinelli
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRLudwig Cancer Research · USUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USUniversidade Federal do Paraná · BRUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main challenges in cancer research is the development of vaccines that induce effective and long-lived protective immunity against tumors. Significant progress has been made in identifying members of the cancer testis antigen family as potential vaccine candidates. However, an ideal form for antigen delivery that induces robust and sustainable antigen-specific T-cell responses, and in particular of CD8(+) T lymphocytes, remains to be developed. Here we report the use of a recombinant nonpathogenic clone of Trypanosoma cruzi as a vaccine vector to induce vigorous and long-term T cell-mediated immunity. The rationale for using the highly attenuated T. cruzi clone was (i) the ability of the parasite to persist in host tissues and therefore to induce a long-term antigen-specific immune response; (ii) the existence of intrinsic parasite agonists for Toll-like receptors and consequent induction of highly polarized T helper cell type 1 responses; and (iii) the parasite replication in the host cell cytoplasm, leading to direct antigen presentation through the endogenous pathway and consequent induction of antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. Importantly, we found that parasites expressing a cancer testis antigen (NY-ESO-1) were able to elicit human antigen-specific T-cell responses in vitro and solid protection against melanoma in a mouse model. Furthermore, in a therapeutic protocol, the parasites expressing NY-ESO-1 delayed the rate of tumor development in mice. We conclude that the T. cruzi vector is highly efficient in inducing T cell-mediated immunity and protection against cancer cells. More broadly, this strategy could be used to elicit a long-term T cell-mediated immunity and used for prophylaxis or therapy of chronic infectious diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBlotting, WesternCancer VaccinesCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedChagas DiseaseEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGenetic VectorsHumansImmunizationMaleMembrane ProteinsMiceAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCTAG1B protein, humanMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22114198
PMCPMC3241774
OpenAlexW2041451382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.