Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22114196›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011

Scaffold number in yeast signaling system sets tradeoff between system output and dynamic range.

Ty M Thomson, Kirsten R Benjamin, Alan Bush, Tonya Love, David Pincus, Orna Resnekov, Richard C Yu, Andrew Gordon, Alejandro Colman-Lerner, Drew Endy and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients.Annual review of biophysics · 2022
    Review
  5. Designed Asymmetric Protein Assembly on a Symmetric Scaffold.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Preserving Single Cells in Space and Time for Analytical Assays.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Automated visualization of rule-based models.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Single-cell dynamics and variability of MAPK activity in a yeast differentiation pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ty M ThomsonDepartment of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Kirsten R Benjamin
Alan Bush
Tonya Love
David Pincus
Orna Resnekov
Richard C Yu
Andrew Gordon
Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Drew Endy
Roger Brent
Molecular Sciences Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

SIMULATION METHODS-PREDICITNG REGULATORY SYSTEM BEHAVIORP50HG002370 · NHGRI · VTT/MSI MOLECULAR SCIENCES INSTITUTE · PI BRENT, ROGER · 2002 to 2007
$21.5M
Dynamics of gradient sensing in single cellsR01GM097479 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BRENT, ROGER · 2011 to 2014
$2.1M
NHGRI NIH HHS P50 HG002370NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097479
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the proteins comprising many signaling systems are known, less is known about their numbers per cell. Existing measurements often vary by more than 10-fold. Here, we devised improved quantification methods to measure protein abundances in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway, an archetypical signaling system. These methods limited variation between independent measurements of protein abundance to a factor of two. We used these measurements together with quantitative models to identify and investigate behaviors of the pheromone response system sensitive to precise abundances. The difference between the maximum and basal signaling output (dynamic range) of the pheromone response MAPK cascade was strongly sensitive to the abundance of Ste5, the MAPK scaffold protein, and absolute system output depended on the amount of Fus3, the MAPK. Additional analysis and experiment suggest that scaffold abundance sets a tradeoff between maximum system output and system dynamic range, a prediction supported by recent experiments.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionSystems BiologyFluorescenceImmunoblottingMAP Kinase Signaling SystemModels, BiologicalPheromonesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsPheromonesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22114196
PMCPMC3250143
OpenAlexW2002452115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.