Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22114138›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2012

PTEN deletion in prostate cancer cells does not associate with loss of RAD51 function: implications for radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

Michael Fraser, Helen Zhao, Kaisa R Luoto, Cecilia Lundin, Carla Coackley, Norman Chan, Anthony M Joshua, Tarek A Bismar, Andrew Evans, Thomas Helleday and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Science advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Precision Medicine forCancers · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael FraserOntario Cancer Institute/Princess Margaret Hospital (University Health Network), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Helen Zhao
Kaisa R Luoto
Cecilia Lundin
Carla Coackley
Norman Chan
Anthony M Joshua
Tarek A Bismar
Andrew Evans
Thomas Helleday
Robert G Bristow
CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology · GBUniversity Health Network · CAAlberta Cancer Foundation · CACancer Research UK · GBPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council C18076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePTEN deletions in prostate cancer are associated with tumor aggression and poor outcome. Recent studies have implicated PTEN as a determinant of homologous recombination (HR) through defective RAD51 function. Similar to BRCA1/2-defective tumor cells, PTEN-null prostate and other cancer cells have been reported to be sensitive to PARP inhibitors (PARPi). To date, no direct comparison between PTEN and RAD51 expression in primary prostate tumors has been reported. EXPERIMENTAL

designProstate cancer cell lines and xenografts with known PTEN status (22RV1-PTEN(+/+), DU145-PTEN(+/-), PC3-PTEN(-/-)) and H1299 and HCT116 cancer cells were used to evaluate how PTEN loss affects RAD51 expression and PARPi sensitivity. Primary prostate cancers with known PTEN status were analyzed for RAD51 expression.

resultsPTEN status is not associated with reduced RAD51 mRNA or protein expression in primary prostate cancers. Decreased PTEN expression did not reduce RAD51 expression or clonogenic survival following PARPi among prostate cancer cells that vary in TP53 and PTEN. PARPi sensitivity instead associated with a defect in MRE11 expression. PTEN-deficient cells had only mild PARPi sensitivity and no loss of HR or RAD51 recruitment. Clonogenic cell survival following a series of DNA damaging agents was variable: PTEN-deficient cells were sensitive to ionizing radiation, mitomycin-C, UV, H(2)O(2), and methyl methanesulfonate but not to cisplatin, camptothecin, or paclitaxel.

conclusionsThese data suggest that the relationship between PTEN status and survival following DNA damage is indirect and complex. It is unlikely that PTEN status will be a direct biomarker for HR status or PARPi response in prostate cancer clinical trials.

Indexed as

Gene DeletionAnimalsCell Line, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageEnzyme InhibitorsGene ExpressionGene SilencingHumansMaleMRE11 Homologue ProteinOncogene Proteins, FusionPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsProstatic NeoplasmsPTEN PhosphohydrolaseRad51 RecombinaseDNA-Binding ProteinsEnzyme InhibitorsMRE11 Homologue ProteinMRE11 protein, humanOncogene Proteins, FusionPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsPTEN PhosphohydrolaseRad51 RecombinaseTMPRSS2-ERG fusion protein, human

Identifiers

PMID22114138
PMCPMC3378487
OpenAlexW2151860429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.