ArticleEuropean journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics2012
Investigating the barriers to bioavailability of macrolide antibiotics in the rat.
Article in European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in Veterinary Medicine, a Complex Phenomenon: A Narrative Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Development of an Adult Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Solithromycin in Plasma and Epithelial Lining Fluid.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2017Article
- The Lantibiotic NAI-107 Efficiently Rescues Drosophila melanogaster from Infection with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus USA300.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016Article
- A comparison of in vitro ADME properties and pharmacokinetics of azithromycin and selected 15-membered ring macrolides in rodents.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the roles of gastrointestinal absorption and hepatic extraction as barriers to oral bioavailability for macrolide antibiotics erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin and telithromycin. In this study, the in vitro metabolic stability in rat liver microsomes and hepatocytes, as well as the in vivo pharmacokinetics in rats were determined following intravenous, intraportal, oral and intraduodenal routes of administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for each compound for each route of administration. In vitro metabolic stability studies point to low intrinsic clearance of the tested macrolides in both microsomes (<1 mL/min/g) and hepatocytes (<1 mL/min/g), indicating good stability. The oral bioavailability in rat was low to moderate (14, 36, 36 and 25% for erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin and telithromycin, respectively). Upon intraduodenal dosing, the bioavailability increased by 1.3-3-fold, the highest increase being with roxithromycin, suggesting some loss due to gastric instability. Following portal vein administration, no hepatic first pass effect was observed with roxithromycin, less than 10% with telithromycin, and ca. 20 and 25% for clarithromycin and erythromycin. Our data showed that the tested macrolides display good in vitro metabolic stability, as was confirmed in vivo where a low hepatic first pass effect was observed. The limited oral bioavailability is likely due to poor oral absorption and/or intestinal first pass metabolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.