ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2011
Serum HER2/ECD value in stage I and II early breast cancer: need of a lower cut-off?
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Elevated serum HER-2 predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer and is correlated to ADAM10 expression.Cancer medicine · 2019Article
- Preoperative serum HER2 extracellular domain levels in primary invasive breast cancer.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- Salivary expression of soluble HER2 in breast cancer patients with positive and negative HER2 status.OncoTargets and therapy · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHER2 overexpression is well-established risk factor of worse prognosis in metastatic and early breast cancer. HER2 positivity can be determined from tumor tissue by immunohistochemical staining or by fluorescent in situ hybridization, or from serum by measuring concentration of HER2 receptor extracellular domain (HER2/ECD). HER2/ECD correlates well with worse prognosis in metastatic and locally advanced (stage III) disease if serum concentration is >15 ng/ml, but there are no consistent data for patients with early breast cancer. METHODS AND
results41 patients with stage I and II breast cancer and 52 healthy controls were included into the study. HER2/ECD was determined before surgery and correlated with HER2/neu overexpression, Ki67, hormone receptor status and disease stage, and compared with value in healthy controls. Mean serum HER2/ECD concentration in patients was 8.62 ng/ml and 5.78 ng/ml in controls, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.000061). The best diagnostic cut-off value was 7.7 ng/ml, with 76.92% sensitivity and 72.92% specificity. Positive predictive value of the test was 69.77% and negative predictive value was 79.55%, with 74.71% of patients correctly classified. Serum HER2/ECD correlated with hormone receptors status, and no correlation with histological overexpression has been observed. CONCLUSION. Serum HER2/ECD concentration of ≥7.7 ng/ml has possible diagnostic value in stage I and II breast cancer. It should not be used as a determinant of HER2 positivity. Prognostic significance of HER2/ECD in early breast cancer, its correlation with hormone receptor status, and interconnection between hormone receptors and HER2 receptor signaling should be further analyzed, since it may have therapeutic implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.