Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22113270›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2012

Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay as a tool for analyzing transcription factor activity.

Padmaja Gade, Dhan V Kalvakolanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Padmaja GadeDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Greenebaum Cancer Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Dhan V Kalvakolanu

Funding

MODULATION OF IFN ACTION VIA NOVEL REGULATORY FACTORSR01CA078282 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KALVAKOLANU, DHAN V. · 1998 to 2014
$4.4M
Cytokine modulated novel growth inhibitory mechanismsR01CA105005 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KALVAKOLANU, DHAN V. · 2004 to 2013
$2.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA105005NCI NIH HHS CA78282NCI NIH HHS R01 CA078282NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differential gene expression is facilitated by transcriptional regulatory mechanisms and chromatin modifications through DNA-protein interactions. One of the widely used assays to study this is chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, which enables analysis of association of regulatory molecules to specific promoters and histone modifications in vivo. This is of immense value as ChIP assays can provide glimpse of the regulatory mechanisms involved in gene expression in vivo. This article outlines the general strategies and protocols to study ChIP assays in differential recruitment of transcriptional factors (TFs) and also global analysis of transcription factor recruitment is discussed. Further, the applications of ChIP assays for discovering novel genes that are dependent on specific transcription factors were addressed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlotting, WesternCells, CulturedChromatin ImmunoprecipitationGene Expression RegulationImmunoprecipitationMiceProtein BindingTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID22113270
PMCPMC3891665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.