Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22113254›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2012

Twenty-five year results of the national cancer institute randomized breast conservation trial.

Nicole L Simone, Tu Dan, Joanna Shih, Sharon L Smith, Linda Sciuto, Elena Lita, Marc E Lippman, Eli Glatstein, Sandra M Swain, David N Danforth and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole L SimoneRadiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute/NIH, Building 10-CRC, Room B2-3500, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. simonen@mail.nih.gov
Tu Dan
Joanna Shih
Sharon L Smith
Linda Sciuto
Elena Lita
Marc E Lippman
Eli Glatstein
Sandra M Swain
David N Danforth
Kevin Camphausen
National Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USMedStar Washington Hospital Center · USUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

The Synergy Between Radiotherapy and Molecularly Targeted AgentsZIASC010373 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI CAMPHAUSEN, KEVIN · 2009 to 2025
$22.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA SC010373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast conservation therapy (BCT) consisting of lumpectomy and postoperative radiation has become an accepted alternative to mastectomy (MRM) for the treatment of early stage breast cancer. We currently report the 25 year outcomes of a single institution, prospective, randomized clinical trial at the National Cancer Institute. 237 women with pathologically confirmed invasive breast tumors 5 cm or less were accrued between 1979 and 1987 and randomized to receive either BCT or MRM. Overall survival was the primary endpoint. Patients with node positive disease were included and treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Both arms received axillary dissection. BCT patients had radiation to the whole breast followed by a boost. At a median follow-up of 25.7 years, overall survival was 43.8% for the MRM group and 37.9% for BCT (P = 0.38). Although the cumulative incidence of a disease-free survival event was higher in BCT patients (29.0% MRM vs. 56.4% BCT, P = 0.0017), the additional treatment failures were primarily isolated ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR's) requiring salvage mastectomy. 22.3% of BCT patients experienced an IBTR. Distant disease and second cancers were similar in both arms. After 25 years, long term survival between BCT and MRM continues to be similar in patients treated for early stage breast cancer. Patients receiving BCT may be at risk for additional treatment-related morbidity, which may occur as a late event. Further studies are required to delineate patients at higher risk for these events, and prolonged follow up should be encouraged after treatment for all women.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalBreast NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMastectomy, Modified RadicalMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNational Cancer Institute (U.S.)Proportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID22113254
PMCPMC8369835
OpenAlexW1989848185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.