Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22112396›Full record

ReviewPatient education and counseling2012

A practitioner's guide to interpersonal communication theory: an overview and exploration of selected theories.

Carma L Bylund, Emily B Peterson, Kenzie A Cameron

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Patient education and counseling, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Addressing communication dynamics in traditional medicine use disclosure to physicians.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Does ComPsych Communication Skills Training Alter Trainee Self-Efficacy?Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carma L BylundDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, USA. bylundlc@mskcc.org
Emily B Peterson
Kenzie A Cameron

Funding

Doctor-Patient Communication about Colorectal Cancer Screening and Health DispariK07CA140778 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BYLUND, CARMA L. · 2010 to 2013
$647k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA140778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide a brief overview of selected interpersonal theories and models, and to present examples of their use in healthcare communication research.

resultsNine interpersonal communication theories and their application to healthcare communication are discussed.

conclusionAs healthcare communication interactions often occur at an interpersonal level, familiarity with theories of interpersonal communication may reinforce existing best practices and lead to the development of novel communication approaches with patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This article serves as an introductory primer to theories of interpersonal communication that have been or could be applied to healthcare communication research. Understanding key constructs and general formulations of these theories may provide practitioners with additional theoretical frameworks to use when interacting with patients.

Indexed as

CommunicationInterpersonal RelationsProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultGuidelines as TopicHealth Services ResearchHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID22112396
PMCPMC3297682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.