Trial reportBMC psychiatry2011
REFOCUS Trial: protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of a pro-recovery intervention within community based mental health teams.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Factors influencing the implementation of mental health recovery into services: a systematic mixed studies review.Systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- International differences in understanding recovery: systematic review.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2012Pooled it
- Trial
- The PULSAR Specialist Care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized control trial of a training intervention for community mental health teams in recovery-oriented practice.BMC psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Evaluation of a positive psychotherapy group intervention for people with psychosis: pilot randomised controlled trial.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2016Trial
- A cluster-randomised controlled trial of values-based training to promote autonomously held recovery values in mental health workers.Implementation science : IS · 2016Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Improving implementation of evidence-based practice in mental health service delivery: protocol for a cluster randomised quasi-experimental investigation of staff-focused values interventions.Implementation science : IS · 2013Trial
- The effect of Soteria on personal recovery in early episode psychosis - a two-year naturalistic cohort comparison with care as usual.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- Personal recovery in mental health difficulties in people with experience of homelessness: qualitative systematic review.BJPsych open · 2025Review
- Evaluation of a pro-recovery training intervention (REFOCUS-RETAFORM) in specialist mental health services across France: stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Article
- Recovery-oriented nursing service for people with schizophrenia in the community: An integrative review.Belitung nursing journal · 2023Review
- Easier Said Than Done: The Challenge to Teach "Personal Recovery" to Mental Health Professionals Through a Short, Targeted and Structured Training Programme.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Cognitive Remediation and Social Recovery in Early Psychosis (CReSt-R): protocol for a pilot randomised controlled study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2022Article
- Training Peer Support Workers in Mental Health Care: A Mixed Methods Study in Central Catalonia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Evaluation of radically open dialectical behaviour therapy in an adult community mental health team: effectiveness in people with autism spectrum disorders.BJPsych bulletin · 2021Article
- Management of a High-Performing Mental Health Recovery Research Group.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Recovery Education for Adults Transitioning From Homelessness: A Longitudinal Outcome Evaluation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a consensus about the importance of 'recovery' in mental health services, but the evidence base is limited. METHODS/
designA two centre, cluster randomised controlled trial. Participants are community-based mental health teams, and service users aged 18-65 years with a primary clinical diagnosis of psychosis. In relation to the REFOCUS Manual researchintorecovery.com/refocus, which describes a 12-month, pro-recovery intervention based on the REFOCUS Model, the objectives are: (1) To establish the effectiveness of the intervention described in the REFOCUS Manual; (2) To validate the REFOCUS Model; (3) To establish and optimise trial parameters for the REFOCUS Manual; and (4) To understand the relationship between clinical outcomes and recovery outcomes. The hypothesis for the main study is that service users in the intervention arm will experience significantly greater increases in measures of personal recovery (as measured by the QPR) compared to service users receiving care from control teams. The hypothesis for the secondary study is that black service users in the intervention arm will experience significantly greater increases in measures of personal recovery (as measured by the QPR) and client satisfaction (as measured by the CSQ) compared to Black service users receiving care from control teams. The intervention comprises treatment as usual plus two components: recovery-promoting relationships and working practices. The control condition is treatment as usual. The primary outcme is the Process of Recovery Questionnaire (QPR). Secondary outcomes are satisfaction, Goal setting - Personal Primary Outcome, hope, well-being, empowerment, and quality of life. Primary outcomes for the secondary study will be QPR and satisfaction. Cost data will be estimated, and clinical outcomes will also be reported (symptomatology, need, social disability, functioning). 29 teams (15 intervention and 14 control) will be randomised. Within each team, 15 services users will be randomly chosen, giving a total sample of 435 service users (225 in intervention and 210 in control). Power for the main study: 336 service users will give power to detect a medium effect size of 0.4 (alpha 0.05, power = 0.8) on both QPR sub-scales. Power for the secondary study: 89 participants will give power to detect an effect size of 0.67 on both QPR sub-scales and on CSQ. A range of approaches are used to minimise bias, although service users and clinicians cannot be blinded. DISCUSSION: This cluster-RCT will evaluate a pro-recovery intervention in community mental health teams.
trial registrationISRCTN: ISRCTN02507940.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.