Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22110703›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Testing Hardy-Weinberg proportions in a frequency-matched case-control genetic association study.

Jian Wang, Sanjay Shete

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Association between Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms ofJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017
    Article
  4. A POWERFUL METHOD FOR INCLUDING GENOTYPE UNCERTAINTY IN TESTS OF HARDY-WEINBERG EQUILIBRIUM.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2017
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jian WangDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Sanjay Shete
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Transdisciplinary Research in Cancer of the Lung (TRICL)U19CA148127 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I., LE MARCHAND, LOIC · 2010 to 2014
$10.9M
ECOGENETIC STUDY OF LUNG CANCER IN MINORITIESR01CA055769 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SPITZ, MARGARET R · 1991 to 2008
$5.3M
High Density Association Analysis of Lung CancerR01CA121197 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI AMOS, CHRISTOPHER I. · 2007 to 2010
$3.0M
Genome Wide Association Study of Head and Neck CancerR01CA131324 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SHETE, SANJAY · 2009 to 2013
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA131324NCI NIH HHS R01 CA055769NCI NIH HHS R01 CA121197NCI NIH HHS R01CA121197NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131324NCI NIH HHS R01CA55769NCI NIH HHS U19 CA148127NCI NIH HHS U19CA148127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In case-control genetic association studies, cases are subjects with the disease and controls are subjects without the disease. At the time of case-control data collection, information about secondary phenotypes is also collected. In addition to studies of primary diseases, there has been some interest in studying genetic variants associated with secondary phenotypes. In genetic association studies, the deviation from Hardy-Weinberg proportion (HWP) of each genetic marker is assessed as an initial quality check to identify questionable genotypes. Generally, HWP tests are performed based on the controls for the primary disease or secondary phenotype. However, when the disease or phenotype of interest is common, the controls do not represent the general population. Therefore, using only controls for testing HWP can result in a highly inflated type I error rate for the disease- and/or phenotype-associated variants. Recently, two approaches, the likelihood ratio test (LRT) approach and the mixture HWP (mHWP) exact test were proposed for testing HWP in samples from case-control studies. Here, we show that these two approaches result in inflated type I error rates and could lead to the removal from further analysis of potential causal genetic variants associated with the primary disease and/or secondary phenotype when the study of primary disease is frequency-matched on the secondary phenotype. Therefore, we proposed alternative approaches, which extend the LRT and mHWP approaches, for assessing HWP that account for frequency matching. The goal was to maintain more (possible causative) single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the sample for further analysis. Our simulation results showed that both extended approaches could control type I error probabilities. We also applied the proposed approaches to test HWP for SNPs from a genome-wide association study of lung cancer that was frequency-matched on smoking status and found that the proposed approaches can keep more genetic variants for association studies.

Indexed as

GenotypeCase-Control StudiesFemaleGene FrequencyGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLikelihood FunctionsLung NeoplasmsMalePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilitySmokingGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22110703
PMCPMC3215743
OpenAlexW2072328842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.