Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22110661›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Computational modeling of interactions between multiple myeloma and the bone microenvironment.

Yan Wang, Peter Pivonka, Pascal R Buenzli, David W Smith, Colin R Dunstan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Management of Myeloma Bone Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Bone metastasis treatment modeling via optimal control.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Mathematical modelling of the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma-induced bone disease.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan WangDepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. wangyan00@tsinghua.org.cn
Peter Pivonka
Pascal R Buenzli
David W Smith
Colin R Dunstan
University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy that is characterized by osteolytic bone lesions. It has been postulated that positive feedback loops in the interactions between MM cells and the bone microenvironment form reinforcing 'vicious cycles', resulting in more bone resorption and MM cell population growth in the bone microenvironment. Despite many identified MM-bone interactions, the combined effect of these interactions and their relative importance are unknown. In this paper, we develop a computational model of MM-bone interactions and clarify whether the intercellular signaling mechanisms implemented in this model appropriately drive MM disease progression. This new computational model is based on the previous bone remodeling model of Pivonka et al., and explicitly considers IL-6 and MM-BMSC (bone marrow stromal cell) adhesion related pathways, leading to formation of two positive feedback cycles in this model. The progression of MM disease is simulated numerically, from normal bone physiology to a well established MM disease state. Our simulations are consistent with known behaviors and data reported for both normal bone physiology and for MM disease. The model results suggest that the two positive feedback cycles identified for this model are sufficient to jointly drive the MM disease progression. Furthermore, quantitative analysis performed on the two positive feedback cycles clarifies the relative importance of the two positive feedback cycles, and identifies the dominant processes that govern the behavior of the two positive feedback cycles. Using our proposed quantitative criteria, we identify which of the positive feedback cycles in this model may be considered to be 'vicious cycles'. Finally, key points at which to block the positive feedback cycles in MM-bone interactions are identified, suggesting potential drug targets.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationTumor MicroenvironmentBone and BonesBone NeoplasmsCell CountDisease ProgressionFeedback, PhysiologicalHumansModels, BiologicalMultiple MyelomaOrgan SizeTime FactorsTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID22110661
PMCPMC3210790
OpenAlexW2060363283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.