ArticlePloS one2011
Computational modeling of interactions between multiple myeloma and the bone microenvironment.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- The bone ecosystem facilitates multiple myeloma relapse and the evolution of heterogeneous drug resistant disease.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A review of mathematical modeling of bone remodeling from a systems biology perspective.Frontiers in systems biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Dynamic modeling of bone remodeling, osteolytic metastasis and PK/PD therapy: introducing variable order derivatives as a simplification technique.Journal of mathematical biology · 2021Review
- Management of Myeloma Bone Lesions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Mathematical modelling of the role of GADD45β in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Toward a Mathematical Modeling of Diseases' Impact on Bone Remodeling: Technical Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Modeling the Effects of Multiple Myeloma on Kidney Function.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Bone metastasis treatment modeling via optimal control.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- An integrative model of prostate cancer interaction with the bone microenvironment.Mathematical biosciences · 2017Article
- Engineering 3D Models of Tumors and Bone to Understand Tumor-Induced Bone Disease and Improve Treatments.Current osteoporosis reports · 2017Review
- Expression Profiles of the Individual Genes Corresponding to the Genes Generated by Cytotoxicity Experiments with Bortezomib in Multiple Myeloma.Turkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2016Article
- Mathematical modelling of the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma-induced bone disease.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2014Article
- Contributions of the host microenvironment to cancer-induced bone disease.Cancer research · 2014Review
- Reaction-diffusion-delay model for EPO/TNF-α interaction in articular cartilage lesion abatement.Biology direct · 2012Article
- In silico investigations of the anti-catabolic effects of pamidronate and denosumab on multiple myeloma-induced bone disease.PloS one · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy that is characterized by osteolytic bone lesions. It has been postulated that positive feedback loops in the interactions between MM cells and the bone microenvironment form reinforcing 'vicious cycles', resulting in more bone resorption and MM cell population growth in the bone microenvironment. Despite many identified MM-bone interactions, the combined effect of these interactions and their relative importance are unknown. In this paper, we develop a computational model of MM-bone interactions and clarify whether the intercellular signaling mechanisms implemented in this model appropriately drive MM disease progression. This new computational model is based on the previous bone remodeling model of Pivonka et al., and explicitly considers IL-6 and MM-BMSC (bone marrow stromal cell) adhesion related pathways, leading to formation of two positive feedback cycles in this model. The progression of MM disease is simulated numerically, from normal bone physiology to a well established MM disease state. Our simulations are consistent with known behaviors and data reported for both normal bone physiology and for MM disease. The model results suggest that the two positive feedback cycles identified for this model are sufficient to jointly drive the MM disease progression. Furthermore, quantitative analysis performed on the two positive feedback cycles clarifies the relative importance of the two positive feedback cycles, and identifies the dominant processes that govern the behavior of the two positive feedback cycles. Using our proposed quantitative criteria, we identify which of the positive feedback cycles in this model may be considered to be 'vicious cycles'. Finally, key points at which to block the positive feedback cycles in MM-bone interactions are identified, suggesting potential drug targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.