Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22110594›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Analysis of gap gene regulation in a 3D organism-scale model of the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

James B Hengenius, Michael Gribskov, Ann E Rundell, Charless C Fowlkes, David M Umulis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dynamic Modeling of Transcriptional Gene Regulatory Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emergence of form in embryogenesis.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Mechanisms of scaling in pattern formation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2013
    Review
  9. The importance of geometry in mathematical models of developing systems.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2012
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James B HengeniusDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America.
Michael Gribskov
Ann E Rundell
Charless C Fowlkes
David M Umulis
Purdue University West Lafayette · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

BIOPHYS STUD OF PROTEINS, NUCLEIC ACIDS, AND VIRUSEST32GM008296 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI STAUFFACHER, CYNTHIA VIANNE · 1989 to 2012
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5T32GM008296-21NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The axial bodyplan of Drosophila melanogaster is determined during a process called morphogenesis. Shortly after fertilization, maternal bicoid mRNA is translated into Bicoid (Bcd). This protein establishes a spatially graded morphogen distribution along the anterior-posterior (AP) axis of the embryo. Bcd initiates AP axis determination by triggering expression of gap genes that subsequently regulate each other's expression to form a precisely controlled spatial distribution of gene products. Reaction-diffusion models of gap gene expression on a 1D domain have previously been used to infer complex genetic regulatory network (GRN) interactions by optimizing model parameters with respect to 1D gap gene expression data. Here we construct a finite element reaction-diffusion model with a realistic 3D geometry fit to full 3D gap gene expression data. Though gap gene products exhibit dorsal-ventral asymmetries, we discover that previously inferred gap GRNs yield qualitatively correct AP distributions on the 3D domain only when DV-symmetric initial conditions are employed. Model patterning loses qualitative agreement with experimental data when we incorporate a realistic DV-asymmetric distribution of Bcd. Further, we find that geometry alone is insufficient to account for DV-asymmetries in the final gap gene distribution. Additional GRN optimization confirms that the 3D model remains sensitive to GRN parameter perturbations. Finally, we find that incorporation of 3D data in simulation and optimization does not constrain the search space or improve optimization results.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalModels, GeneticAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianGenes, InsectHomeodomain ProteinsTrans-Activatorsbcd protein, DrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID22110594
PMCPMC3217930
OpenAlexW2056680906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.