Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22110084›Full record

Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2012

Frequency and amplitude modulation have different effects on the percepts elicited by retinal stimulation.

Devyani Nanduri, Ione Fine, Alan Horsager, Geoffrey M Boynton, Mark S Humayun, Robert J Greenberg, James D Weiland

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00279500 (Chronic Retinal Electrodes to Provide Electrical Stimulation of the Retina to Elicit Visual Percepts in Blind Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00279500 nacompletednot on this map

Chronic Retinal Electrodes to Provide Electrical Stimulation of the Retina to Elicit Visual Percepts in Blind Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorSecond Sight Medical ProductsRan2002 to 2014Enrolled6ConditionsRetinitis PigmentosaArmsArgus 16 Retinal Stimulation System
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Restoration of Sight with Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating Deep Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Retinal Implants Using Sighted Participants.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Deep Stimulus Encoding in Visual Prostheses.Advances in neural information processing systems · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Devyani NanduriDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA. nanduri@usc.edu
Ione Fine
Alan Horsager
Geoffrey M Boynton
Mark S Humayun
Robert J Greenberg
James D Weiland

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MAUREEN E NEITZ · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Research/Development of Artificial Rentinas for the BlindR01EY012893 · NEI · SECOND SIGHT MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. · PI GREENBERG, ROBERT JAY · 2006 to 2010
$12.9M
The Effects of Visual DeprivationR01EY014645 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FINE, IONE · 2004 to 2021
$5.3M
NEI NIH HHS 5R01EY012893-10NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012893NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn an effort to restore functional form vision, epiretinal prostheses that elicit percepts by directly stimulating remaining retinal circuitry were implanted in human subjects with advanced retinitis pigmentosa RP). In this study, manipulating pulse train frequency and amplitude had different effects on the size and brightness of phosphene appearance.

methodsExperiments were performed on a single subject with severe RP (implanted with a 16-channel epiretinal prosthesis in 2004) on nine individual electrodes. Psychophysical techniques were used to measure both the brightness and size of phosphenes when the biphasic pulse train was varied by either modulating the current amplitude (with constant frequency) or the stimulating frequency (with constant current amplitude).

resultsIncreasing stimulation frequency always increased brightness, while having a smaller effect on the size of elicited phosphenes. In contrast, increasing stimulation amplitude generally increased both the size and brightness of phosphenes. These experimental findings can be explained by using a simple computational model based on previous psychophysical work and the expected spatial spread of current from a disc electrode.

conclusionsGiven that amplitude and frequency have separable effects on percept size, these findings suggest that frequency modulation improves the encoding of a wide range of brightness levels without a loss of spatial resolution. Future retinal prosthesis designs could benefit from having the flexibility to manipulate pulse train amplitude and frequency independently (clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT00279500).

Indexed as

Electrodes, ImplantedBlindnessElectric Stimulation TherapyFollow-Up StudiesHumansMicroelectrodesMiddle AgedRetinaRetinitis PigmentosaSensory ThresholdsTreatment OutcomeVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22110084
PMCPMC3292357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.