Trial reportInternational urology and nephrology1990
Comparison of captopril and enalapril in the treatment of hypertension in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus and nephropathy.
Trial report in International urology and nephrology, 1990. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Renal protective effect of enalapril in diabetic nephropathy.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 1992Trial
- Effect of chronic treatment with losartan on streptozotocin-induced renal dysfunction.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2003Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eighteen patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), hypertension and nephropathy were randomized to receive captopril or enalapril for 6 months. Two patients with serum creatinine of greater than 400 mumol/l had to be excluded from the study because of rapidly deteriorating renal function after starting treatment. Of the remaining patients, 7 received captopril and 9 received enalapril. Blood pressure control was achieved in about 50% of patients with either drug alone. Serum creatinine and creatinine clearance were unchanged in both groups but there was a greater tendency for the former to increase in patients with higher pretreatment values. Proteinuria was reduced at 1 month only in the enalapril group which also showed a significant elevation of serum potassium after treatment. Captopril and enalapril have only a modest antihypertensive action in patients with NIDDM and nephropathy. Their use in patients with renal insufficiency must be balanced against the risk of further aggravating the deterioration of renal function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
2210987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.