Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22109820›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2011

Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories.

Yeyang Su, Heidi C Howard, Pascal Borry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Elective genomic sequencing for adults in research, clinical and commercial contexts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impacts of personal DNA ancestry testing.Journal of community genetics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Motivations of participants in the citizen science of microbiomics: data from the British Gut Project.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Adopting genetics: motivations and outcomes of personal genomic testing in adult adoptees.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yeyang SuCentre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kapucijnenovoer 35, Box 7001, 3000, Leuven, Belgium, suyeyang@yahoo.com.cn.
Heidi C Howard
Pascal Borry

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relatively rapid growth of the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing market in the last few years has led to increasing attention from both the scientific community and policy makers. One voice often missing in these debates, however, is that of the actual user of these genetic testing services. In order to gain a better picture of the motivations and expectations that propel individuals to purchase DTC genome-wide testing, we conducted an exploratory study based on users' personal stories. Through qualitative content analysis of users' personal stories found on Internet blogs and DTC genetic testing companies' websites, we identified five major sets of motivations and expectations towards DTC genome-wide testing. These themes are related to (1) health, (2) curiosity and fascination, (3) genealogy, (4) contributing to research, and (5) recreation. Obtaining such information can help us to understand how users consider genome-wide testing and forms the basis for further research.

Identifiers

PMID22109820
PMCPMC3186033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.