ArticleEndoscopy2012
Learning to perform endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasia is associated with significant complications even within a structured training program.
Article in Endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016Guideline
- Trial
- Review
- JAG consensus statements for training and certification in oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Sealing the hole: endoscopic management of acute gastrointestinal perforations.Frontline gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Endoscopic management of esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Review
- Training in endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection: Face, content and expert validity of the live porcine model.United European gastroenterology journal · 2018Article
- Endoscopic Eradication Therapy in Barrett's Esophagus.Techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017Article
- Development of Quality Indicators for Endoscopic Eradication Therapies in Barrett's Esophagus: The TREAT-BE (Treatment With Resection and Endoscopic Ablation Techniques for Barrett's Esophagus) Consortium.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016Review
- Emerging Concepts for the Endoscopic Management of Superficial Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016Review
- Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Treating Large Early Esophageal Squamous Cell Neoplasia.Medicine · 2015Observational
- Effects of the Learning Curve on Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Barrett's Esophagus.Gastroenterology · 2015Article
- Multiband mucosectomy for advanced dysplastic lesions in the upper digestive tract.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Review
- Treatment of dysplastic Barrett's Oesophagus in lower volume centres after structured training.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015Article
- EMR is not inferior to ESD for early Barrett's and EGJ neoplasia: An extensive review on outcome, recurrence and complication rates.Endoscopy international open · 2014Review
- Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett's esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013Article
- Barrett's esophagus in 2012: updates in pathogenesis, treatment, and surveillance.Current gastroenterology reports · 2013Review
- Esophageal tissue engineering: a new approach for esophageal replacement.World journal of gastroenterology · 2012Review
- Barrett's esophagus: lessons from recent clinical trials.Annals of gastroenterologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY
aimsEndoscopic resection is the cornerstone of endoscopic treatment of esophageal high grade dysplasia or early cancer. Endoscopic resection is, however, a technically demanding procedure, which requires training and expertise. The aim of the current study was to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of the first 120 endoscopic resection procedures of early esophageal neoplasia performed by six endoscopists (20 endoscopic resections each) who were participating in an endoscopic resection training program. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe program consisted of four tri-monthly 1-day courses with lectures, live-demonstrations, hands-on training on anesthetized pigs, and one-on-one hands-on training days. Gastroenterologists from centers with multidisciplinary expertise in upper gastrointestinal oncology participated, together with an endoscopy nurse and a pathologist. Outcome measures were complete endoscopic removal of the target area and acute complications.
resultsA total of 120 consecutive esophageal endoscopic resection procedures (85 ER-cap, 35 multiband mucosectomy [MBM]) were performed by six endoscopists: 109 in Barrett's esophagus, 11 for squamous neoplasia; 85 piecemeal endoscopic resections (median 3 specimens, interquartile range 2 - 4 specimens). Complete endoscopic removal was achieved in 111 /120 cases (92.5 %). Six perforations occurred (5.0 %): five were effectively treated endoscopically (clips, covered stent), and one patient underwent esophagectomy. There were 11 acute mild bleedings (9.2 %), which were managed endoscopically. Perforations occurred in ER-cap procedures performed by four participants (7.1 % ER-cap vs. 0 % MBM; P = 0.18), and in 1.7 % of the first 10 endoscopic resections and 8.3 % of the second 10 endoscopic resections per endoscopist (P = 0.26).
conclusionIn this intense, structured training program, the first 120 esophageal endoscopic resections performed by six participants were associated with a 5.0 % perforation rate. Although perforations were adequately managed, performing 20 endoscopic resections may not be sufficient to reach the peak of the learning curve in endoscopic resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.