Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22109651›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy2012

Learning to perform endoscopic resection of esophageal neoplasia is associated with significant complications even within a structured training program.

F G I van Vilsteren, R E Pouw, L A Herrero, F P Peters, R Bisschops, M Houben, F T M Peters, B E Schenk, B L A M Weusten, M Visser and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2016
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Endoscopic management of esophageal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Endoscopic Eradication Therapy in Barrett's Esophagus.Techniques in gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Role of endoscopy in early oesophageal cancer.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2016
    Review
  11. Emerging Concepts for the Endoscopic Management of Superficial Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2016
    Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection for Barrett's esophagus.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

F G I van VilsterenGastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R E Pouw
L A Herrero
F P Peters
R Bisschops
M Houben
F T M Peters
B E Schenk
B L A M Weusten
M Visser
F J W Ten Kate
P Fockens
E J Schoon
J J G H M Bergman
Academic Medical Center · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NLHaga Hospital · NLIsala · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsEndoscopic resection is the cornerstone of endoscopic treatment of esophageal high grade dysplasia or early cancer. Endoscopic resection is, however, a technically demanding procedure, which requires training and expertise. The aim of the current study was to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of the first 120 endoscopic resection procedures of early esophageal neoplasia performed by six endoscopists (20 endoscopic resections each) who were participating in an endoscopic resection training program. PATIENTS AND

methodsThe program consisted of four tri-monthly 1-day courses with lectures, live-demonstrations, hands-on training on anesthetized pigs, and one-on-one hands-on training days. Gastroenterologists from centers with multidisciplinary expertise in upper gastrointestinal oncology participated, together with an endoscopy nurse and a pathologist. Outcome measures were complete endoscopic removal of the target area and acute complications.

resultsA total of 120 consecutive esophageal endoscopic resection procedures (85 ER-cap, 35 multiband mucosectomy [MBM]) were performed by six endoscopists: 109 in Barrett's esophagus, 11 for squamous neoplasia; 85 piecemeal endoscopic resections (median 3 specimens, interquartile range 2 - 4 specimens). Complete endoscopic removal was achieved in 111 /120 cases (92.5 %). Six perforations occurred (5.0 %): five were effectively treated endoscopically (clips, covered stent), and one patient underwent esophagectomy. There were 11 acute mild bleedings (9.2 %), which were managed endoscopically. Perforations occurred in ER-cap procedures performed by four participants (7.1 % ER-cap vs. 0 % MBM; P = 0.18), and in 1.7 % of the first 10 endoscopic resections and 8.3 % of the second 10 endoscopic resections per endoscopist (P = 0.26).

conclusionIn this intense, structured training program, the first 120 esophageal endoscopic resections performed by six participants were associated with a 5.0 % perforation rate. Although perforations were adequately managed, performing 20 endoscopic resections may not be sufficient to reach the peak of the learning curve in endoscopic resection.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, GraduateAgedAnimalsBarrett EsophagusCarcinoma, Squamous CellClinical CompetenceEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal PerforationEsophagoscopyEsophagusFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLearning CurveMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22109651
OpenAlexW2127138616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.