Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22108729›Full record

ReviewHeart failure clinics2012

Neurohumoral stimulation.

Irving H Zucker, Kaushik P Patel, Harold D Schultz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure clinics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advancing organ-on-chip systems: the role of microfluidics in neuro-cardiac research.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2025
    Review
  12. CaBiomolecules · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. A new perspective on HIV: effects of HIV on brain-heart axis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Irving H ZuckerDepartment of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 985850 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5850, USA. izucker@unmc.edu
Kaushik P Patel
Harold D Schultz
Nebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

The Role of Excitatory Input into the PVN on Increased Sympathetic Drive in HeartP01HL062222 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHULTZ, HAROLD D · 1999 to 2019
$32.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL062222NHLBI NIH HHS P0-1 HL62222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The temporal relationship between the development of heart failure and activation of the neurohumoral systems involved in chronic heart failure (CHF) has not been precisely defined. When a compensatory mechanism switches to a deleterious contributing factor in the progression of the disease is unclear. This article addresses these issues through evaluating the contribution of various cardiovascular reflexes and cellular mechanisms to the sympathoexcitation in CHF. It also sheds light on some of the important central mechanisms that contribute to the increase in sympathetic nerve activity in CHF.

Indexed as

AnimalsBaroreflexChemoreceptor CellsDisease ProgressionHeart FailureHumansNeurotransmitter AgentsSympathetic Nervous SystemNeurotransmitter Agents

Identifiers

PMID22108729
PMCPMC3224981
OpenAlexW4211110090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.