Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22108601›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Molecular cell biology2011

All tangled up: how cells direct, manage and exploit topoisomerase function.

Seychelle M Vos, Elsa M Tretter, Bryan H Schmidt, James M Berger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 376 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
376citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

376 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Roles of Topoisomerases in Transcriptional Regulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

316 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seychelle M VosDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
Elsa M Tretter
Bryan H Schmidt
James M Berger

Funding

Structural and Biochemical Analyses of Type II DNA TopoisomerasesR01CA077373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BERGER, JAMES M. · 1999 to 2021
$7.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA077373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA077373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topoisomerases are complex molecular machines that modulate DNA topology to maintain chromosome superstructure and integrity. Although capable of stand-alone activity in vitro, topoisomerases are frequently linked to larger pathways and systems that resolve specific DNA superstructures and intermediates arising from cellular processes such as DNA repair, transcription, replication and chromosome compaction. Topoisomerase activity is indispensible to cells, but requires the transient breakage of DNA strands. This property has been exploited, often for significant clinical benefit, by various exogenous agents that interfere with cell proliferation. Despite decades of study, surprising findings involving topoisomerases continue to emerge with respect to their cellular function, regulation and utility as therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome SegregationDNADNA ReplicationDNA TopoisomerasesGene Expression RegulationHumansTopoisomerase InhibitorsDNADNA TopoisomerasesTopoisomerase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID22108601
PMCPMC4351964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.