ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2011
Mathematical modeling of prostate cancer progression in response to androgen ablation therapy.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Digital twins for personalized treatment in uro-oncology in the era of artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Physics-informed machine learning digital twin for reconstructing prostate cancer tumor growth via PSA tests.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning models for predicting prostate cancer recurrence and identifying potential molecular biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Agent-based modeling of the prostate tumor microenvironment uncovers spatial tumor growth constraints and immunomodulatory properties.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Patient-specific prostate tumour growth simulation: a first step towards the digital twin.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Towards early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: advances in immune-related blood biomarkers and computational approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Data integration between clinical research and patient care: A framework for context-depending data sharing and in silico predictions.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- A survey of open questions in adaptive therapy: Bridging mathematics and clinical translation.eLife · 2023Article
- Patient-specific forecasting of postradiotherapy prostate-specific antigen kinetics enables early prediction of biochemical relapse.iScience · 2022Article
- High Accuracy Indicators of Androgen Suppression Therapy Failure for Prostate Cancer-A Modeling Study.Cancers · 2022Article
- Article
- Investigating key cell types and molecules dynamics in PyMT mice model of breast cancer through a mathematical model.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Combination therapy for mCRPC with immune checkpoint inhibitors, ADT and vaccine: A mathematical model.PloS one · 2022Article
- Modeling colorectal cancer evolution.Journal of human genetics · 2021Review
- Do mechanisms matter? Comparing cancer treatment strategies across mathematical models and outcome objectives.Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Modeling the Human Bone-Tumor Niche: Reducing and Replacing the Need for Animal Data.JBMR plus · 2020Review
- Optimal control to reach eco-evolutionary stability in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer progression depends in part on the complex interactions between testosterone, its active metabolite DHT, and androgen receptors. In a metastatic setting, the first line of treatment is the elimination of testosterone. However, such interventions are not curative because cancer cells evolve via multiple mechanisms to a castrate-resistant state, allowing progression to a lethal outcome. It is hypothesized that administration of antiandrogen therapy in an intermittent, as opposed to continuous, manner may bestow improved disease control with fewer treatment-related toxicities. The present study develops a biochemically motivated mathematical model of antiandrogen therapy that can be tested prospectively as a predictive tool. The model includes "personalized" parameters, which address the heterogeneity in the predicted course of the disease under various androgen-deprivation schedules. Model simulations are able to capture a variety of clinically observed outcomes for "average" patient data under different intermittent schedules. The model predicts that in the absence of a competitive advantage of androgen-dependent cancer cells over castration-resistant cancer cells, intermittent scheduling can lead to more rapid treatment failure as compared to continuous treatment. However, increasing a competitive advantage for hormone-sensitive cells swings the balance in favor of intermittent scheduling, delaying the acquisition of genetic or epigenetic alterations empowering androgen resistance. Given the near universal prevalence of antiandrogen treatment failure in the absence of competing mortality, such modeling has the potential of developing into a useful tool for incorporation into clinical research trials and ultimately as a prognostic tool for individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.